PREYINGHAWK REPORT #13: TREVOR BEDFORD MIS-INFORMATION ON PRRA WAS FIRST BIG GRANADE ON AN HONEST RESEARCH PAPER THAT COULD HAVE STOPPED COVID EARLY 2020

WHY DID THIS PERSON INTERFERE? HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MIS-INFORMATION AND SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED. SENDING TO HHS INSPECTOR GENERAL.

LOOKS LIKE HE WAS GOING FOR THE BIG $$ AND HIS OWN PERSONAL FINANCIAL GAIN. HE HAS THE DATABASE THAT CHASES THE "STRAINS" OF VIRUS SO HE HAS MADE A LOT OF CASH THANKS TO HIS ELIMINATING A LAB-MADE VIRUS PAPER THAT WAS ABOUT TO BE PUBLISHED.

IF THIS IS TRUE. HE SHOULD BE LOCKED UP.

"Nextstrain is under active development and we have big plans for its future, including visualization, bioinformatics analysis and an increasing number and variety of datasets. If you have any questions or ideas, please give us a shout at hello@nextstrain.org."

WILL SOMEBODY SEND THIS GUY AN EMAIL AND ASK HIM IF HE IS PROUD OF HIMSELF? HAPPY THAT MILLIONS DIED BECAUSE HE BURIED THE STORY.

https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/center-news/2021/09/trevor-bedford-macarthur-fellowship.html

https://nextstrain.org/

https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global/6m

The core Nextstrain team is
Trevor Bedford
Richard Neher
James Hadfield
Emma Hodcroft
Thomas Sibley
John Huddleston
Ivan Aksamentov
Jover Lee
Jennifer Chang
Victor Lin
Cornelius Roemer

PLEASE GO INVESTIGATE THIS TEAM WHO GOT RICH SURVEILLING A FAKE VIRUS!!

DR RICHARD FLEMING METHOD AND PRESENTATIONS FROM ALL SPEAKERS AT THE

HIS YOUTUBE CHANNEL UP UNTIL HE WAS BOOTED OFF THE PLATFORM.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX3QyQcD7CpH6VQIZl-WF1w

FLEMING METHOD
https://www.flemingmethod.com/copy-of-fleming-method

WEBSITE (TONS OF INFORMATION)
https://www.flemingmethod.com/

Richard M. Fleming PhD, MD, JD
In 1994, Dr. Fleming presented to the American Heart Association his "theory" that cardiovascular disease was due to inflammation. What was theory in 1994 has become well known fact for decades and was highlighted in 2004, with a feature on ABC's 20/20 News.

Patent # 9566037 was issued to Dr. Fleming on February 14, 2017.

The Fleming Method patent (FMTVDM) covers ALL methods and devices able to measure metabolic and regional blood flow differences. This breakthrough made it possible to differentiate functionality of tissue, tissue types as well as non-tissue, and the measurement of treatment response using all isotopes, enhancing agents and devices capable of detecting and measuring isotopes.

Developing technology that disrupts the methods of conventional medicine is not always welcomed. Especially when that technology would half the revenue a $20 billion nuclear isotope industry. When physicians bring innovation to medicine, complaints to medical boards often follow along with court cases, which is why it's called, "Disruptive Technology."

https://www.flemingmethod.com/copy-of-fleming-method

https://www.flemingmethod.com/gain-of-function
The year 2020 was a year of unprecedented deception and confusion. What began as a scientific quagmire of competing information surrounding SARS-CoV-2, numerous doctors found themselves being targeted for challenging the established medical orthodoxy. How that fact relates to Dr. Richard Fleming today is a story that began two decades ago.

As a Cardiology Fellow at University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston (1989-1992), Dr. Fleming was involved in the testing of competing nuclear isotopes (tracers) Teboroxine and Sestamibi. At the time, these drugs were still experimental and they were being compared to other drugs already on the market. There was not a lot of information on these isotopes though they both enabled better visual images. Their value in assessing heart disease, however, had been largely misapplied. Dr. Fleming wrote one of the first papers on Teboroxine and SPECT imaging. and the information therein reflected what research physicians and clinicians were being taught at the time. The industry standard required two doses of radioactive isotopes instead of one to capture appropriate heart images.

When using Teboroxine, physicians had to begin imaging within five minutes of administering the isotope. Dr. Fleming thought Teboroxine provided an advantage because more studies could be done faster, answers were derived more quickly and people could be moved along in the diagnostic process more rapidly. Teboroxine could also offer an advantage for hospital systems because the hospitalists would be able to process four times as many patients in the standard four-hour time frame. The competing isotope manufacturer who made Sestamibi, claimed their isotope did not redistribute in the same way as Teboroxine, so a patient would need to wait a minimum of thirty minutes for an image to begin emerging.

Despite other publications (1, 3, 8) showing that Sestamibi redistributed earlier than doctors had been led to believe, the company selling Sestamibi capitalized on the reported 30-minute delay convincing doctors that it would be easier to schedule and image patients with two injections and more flexible timing. As a result, doctors and hospitals chose Sestamibi over Teboroxine. Sestamibi was able to corner the isotope market.

In 1999, however, the manufacturer of Sestamibi requested Dr. Fleming investigate their isotope for use in breast cancer imaging. This request would change Dr. Fleming’s understanding of how Sestamibi worked and would result in several key changes in overall medical understanding of nuclear imaging. First, Dr. Fleming’s discovered that the standard two-injection administration of the isotope could be reduced to just one injection; that this single isotope injection would reveal essential heart images five minutes after the injection. And patients? They would be exposed to far lower levels of radiation.

Other doctors and universities would later validate Fleming (documents 19, 32, 33) and the need to use only one dose of radioactive imaging tracers. Like Fleming, they would report finding heart disease that had been missed by the delayed two-injection dose approach. By using a single injection of Sestamibi and imaging immediately, the five-minute image actually found heart disease that had been previously missed by waiting thirty minutes. It is estimated that heart disease in up to 100,000 critically ill heart patients is missed yearly by waiting this additional amount of time. This change in overall timing of injection and imaging was not only critical to seeing evidence of inflammation but foundational to Dr. Fleming’s development of the Theory of Inflammation.

This evolution in the understanding of isotopes lead to Dr. Fleming developing the Fleming Method for Tissue and Vascular Differential and Metabolism (FMTVDM). The FMTVDM integrates with any nuclear camera and any applicable nuclear isotope to produce "True Quantification" of regional blood flow difference and metabolism. Conventional nuclear images rely on human visual observation for subjective or "guestimate" evaluations. Using Fleming’s FMTVDM, physicians can now accurately measure the severity of heart disease while reducing the amount of radiation exposure.

Doctor Fleming’s troubles with the law began when he had to replace his full time nuclear technologist with a temporary technologist. It would be the latter who would report him to the FBI for illegal billing, despite the fact she was not a billing expert. Forced to close his practice, Dr. Fleming gave the FBI access to his imaging, copy machines, and any information they requested. Despite a lack of criminal evidence, the considerable amount of time and money spent on this investigation meant the FBI seemed determined to find culpability somewhere.

Concurrent with this investigation, Dr. Fleming was working with another doctor who had recruited Fleming to assist in the study of this doctor’s soy chip product. The study sought to prove that if women would eat one to two bags of his soy chips instead of a meal, they would lose weight. The accusation next levied upon Dr. Fleming by the FBI involved the requisite number (60) of patients in the study and a supposed “tip-off” from a coerced part-time front desk employee. The employee, whose husband had been previously incarcerated for crimes committed, was contacted by the FBI and told that she needed to give them (FBI) something on which they could pin on Dr. Fleming, or else they would go after her husband. The employee changed jobs during the study and was replaced by her daughter who also only worked part time. Both reported to the FBI they never saw 60 participants show up for the study.

Despite evidence and data to the contrary, the Judge on Fleming’s case and the attorneys involved prevented evidence of actual innocence from being presented on both the nuclear isotopes billing fraud indictment (4, 5, 6, 7 and 9) and the soy chip study results (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17). The results of the soy chip study had been mailed to the soy chip doctor and account for the charge of mail fraud. On April 23, 2009, following Dr. Fleming’s recognition that evidence of actual innocence was being blocked from being admitted in Court (14, 15), Dr. Fleming pled guilty to two items (16), neither of which are crimes. In addition to being placed on 5-years probation (with 6-months of home confinement and an order to pay restitution based on all patient billings in that year, not just the ten what were tried in the court case), the Nebraska Medical Board revoked Dr. Fleming’s medical license, without giving the legally required notification to Dr. Fleming. The Iowa Board of Medicine would later admit to the fact their consequential actions were part of a “subpar” investigation (25, 27, 28).

In addition to the prosecutor’s intentional interference of the presentation of innocence, a clear violation of the law according to the US Supreme Court ruling in the 1963 Brady v. Maryland, the Public Defender, violating attorney ethics, the Judge, violating Judicial Ethics; the prosecutor asked for and then received permission from the Court to destroy all documents connected with the case (22). The prosecutors certified they had notified Dr. Fleming of their “Notice of Intent to Destroy Exhibits.” However, Dr. Fleming did not receive such notification and would not have agreed to the destruction of this evidence. Dr. Fleming has demonstrated by filing in other Federal Courts his desire to address this violation of his US Constitutional rights. Had his request to produce evidence been granted, he would have, in fact, needed these exhibits.

Dr. Fleming has since tried to address both the ineffective assistance of counsel and the hiding of substantive exculpatory evidence (2, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24) only to have the Judge refuse to address these concerns outright. Dr. Fleming has brought evidence of Judicial Misconduct to the attention of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (23, 29, 30, 31) and called for the impeachment of the Judge and debarment of the attorneys (35) involved in his case.

Dr. Fleming has asked the FDA to further investigate the pharmaceutical company that continues to promote the use of the delayed two-injection Sestamibi isotope and the possible harm to patients resulting from this practice (34).