In the spirit of BLM the La Rose Lane sign that was Black Boy Lane has been vandalised

In the spirit of BLM the La Rose Lane sign that was Black Boy has been vandalised. A few years ago I stated that pulling statues down was wrong and people needed to vote on it. But such as the BLM, councils, universities and many on the left informed us that if your offended by something then pull it down. As such they seemed to support statue’s being pulled down. And so people apparently are angered at a sign called Black Boy names after King Charles II being charged. As such rather than bothering to seek legal ways to change it back they seem to be taking the advice from BLM, councils, universities and many on the left to simply vandalise the sign. Clearly I am not stating that one should vandalise this sign in the way I stated vandalise of the statues. However my point is those on the left who say this is wrong I suspect supported the statues being pulled down and as such I would call them hypocrites. But again the question is why did the BBC article not mention the fact Black Boy was the name of King Charles II but only stated Black Boy was the name of a 17th century pub. Why did they not state many pubs who supported King Charles II named the pubs Black Boy. Was it to mislead people? The next question is did Jeremy Corbyn know the King Charles II connection to the Black Boy name? If not then is he lazy and does not do the most basic research into things he supports? One would presume it would be fundamental of any mp to fact find things before adding support. But if he does know the King Charles II connection to Black Boy Lane then why has he supported it? Clearly he is not stupid and as such would know in no way could it be racist name. So in that circumstance would he simply not say this is an important name of history. Rather than try to change history like the Nazi party would it not be something to be proud of as an interesting fact. Would it in fact be something schools could teach children. Show then the sign and teach the connection to King Charles II. If we are to remove references to Kings and queens then will we now be pulling castles down and pull Houses of Parliament after all presumably these are just as offensive as the name of King Charles II. By the way I notice Black Bot Lane is still on the sign. So it cannot be that offensive.