Shame on you for comparing mRNA technology to traditional vaccines. - Dr Stephen Schmidt

See the full discussion here:

Part 5:
https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5

Discovery equated injection of SARS-CoV-2 viral genetic material with the vaccines we received as children. The fact is that they are totally different. Telling patients and employees that it is simply the vaccine you got as a child, is false.
On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge.

Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss.