Masculine Ridicule for Men who are already Persecuted and Condemned?

Ulterior motives are self-evident when masculinity is suddenly a concern that holds men to being cannon fodder, protectors, pawns and slaves for women instead of considered for their own sake and well-being, especially after decades of persecution by feminists in addition to the traditional misandry (commonly referred to as chivalry and placing women above men--'on a pedestal) men have already endured. It's claimed that we need to have strong men in our society after they have undergone decades of abuse during which time nobody has been there for them. Yet, we expect more out of men and shame men for the results of their constant exposure to misandry. At a time when male suicide is the highest it's ever been we have the audacity to put more on men who been discarded and abused? How do you think we got here? If we can change from the type of men we had in the past perhaps we can reverse the process rather than place more blame on men in the present. Imagine that. Reinstate the laws of the past, and basically undo everything feminists have done to create the misandrist conditions of the present. This will begin to create a sound premise upon which to build. And the change in men will be noticeable very soon. (But the men created in the past are also the ones who allowed the conditions of the present to result too.) Get rid of traditional misandry (chivalry) upon which feminism is built. If males are provided their equal rights, status, needs, consideration (basic love) and equal value to females, don't you think that just may have a positive effect and create a better or more complete male who will naturally develop from this process? If we kick and abuse a dog and then expect even more from that dog that's been abused, are we going to get the best results even if all we care about is a use, pawn and servant identity? Under the right conditions a male will develop naturally to be a good and adequate person to include a masculinity to match. But humans are not clones and they don't live in a vacuum either. The female counterpart will need to change too who has evolved to be a terribly selfish and egotistical human being, not merely failing to do her equal part and upholding equal accountability but purposely damaging men in the process of our human existence. This is the major problem that many ignore and as mere cowards blame men as some kind of default for modern conditions. But again, provide men what they need to be happy and content and they will be proud to be who they are and defend a society/country that treats them right. Oh, but it will take decades to undo the damage done just as it took to cause it in the first place. Only when some perceive a threat do they want to place blame on men no less than have the feminists. But even now they really don't care about men themselves, just what men are 'supposed' to do for them. How shameless are those doing this--traitors to their own people, or that is half of them (males) who they still expect something from with an assigned 'masculine' identity to match their selfish demands.