Theology of the Body Audience 36 | Le Nouvel Esprit Commentary on TOB
Le Nouvel Esprit's video commentary on St. Pope John Paul II's theology of the body, audience 36, from Aug. 20, 1980.
TOB 36 continues investigating the legislative interpretation of the 6th commandment. The language of this interpretation demonstrates that what was considered sexual was "impure", that the focus was on the maintenance of social order, and not concerned with the dimension of the heart as Christ appealed to in Matthew 5:27-28. JPII next introduces the prophetic tradition, which is taken up again in the next audience. The prophetic tradition shows
1) An analogy between Israel and God and the relationship between husband and wife
2) Israel's departure from God for other gods was considered to be adultery
Subscribe to our channel! Support us further by checking out our website and Patreon! If you use Brave, you can also directly tip us here on YouTube or on our website.
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lenouvelesprit
Website: https://www.lenouvelesprit.com/
-
20:05
Le Nouvel Esprit
1 year agoTheology of the Body Audience 35 | Le Nouvel Esprit Commentary on TOB
7 -
21:53
Le Nouvel Esprit
1 year agoTheology of the Body Audience 37 | Le Nouvel Esprit Commentary on TOB
3 -
1:14:57
mercyseat
10 months agoAn Exegetical Eschatology - The Mt. Olivet Discourse
236 -
58:58
Crisis Magazine
1 year agoIs Amoris Laetitia Orthodox? (Guest: Dr. Eduardo Echeverria)
12 -
1:30:52
Dr. Duke Pesta & Stefan Molyneux
1 year agoThe Philosophy of the 10 Commandments | Dr. Duke Pesta & Stefan Molyneux
961 -
6:59
Messiah Matters
1 year agoHow Believers Should Use Rabbinic Literature
2 -
1:13:06
Vox Papae
8 months agoEvangelii Gaudium - Chapter 4 The Social Dimension of the Gospel
25 -
1:14:34
The Orthodox Ethos
8 months agoAn Orthodox Examination of Ecumenism
2882 -
43:53
In Season Ministries With Randy Johnson
10 months agoBible Study For Romans - Reading Paul's Mail 6 - Romans Bible Study
40 -
16:03
Jesus Answers Prayer
2 years ago📖🕯 Holy Bible - Matthew 5 with Matthew Henry Commentary at the end.
19