Ivan Raiklin talks about the narrative pushed by MEDIA and GOVERNMENT into military

Ivan Raiklin: "We've gone away from the focus of fighting and winning our nation's wards and defending the Constitution.If we get back to that, I think we'll be in a better position to start to repel from foreign adversaries, which I kind of pivoted and talked about, namely, obviously the biggest one is China.Also, Russia is helping and advise, I would argue, to make sure it expedites our demise.Iran is probably right there, not in a close third, but in third place.

So if I ask the question of, of Secretary Austin, chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Milly, if I ask you, General, what are you going to do when the 25th Amendment is violated?Oh, you don't know what the 25th Amendment is?How about, what are you going to do when the 12th Amendment is violated?Oh, you don't know that one.Let me go to the base document.

What about article Two, section one, clause two, or article One, section four?Most of these people are going to look at you like deer in the headlights.I have no clue what you're talking about.The thing is that our entire institutions have been through the media, have pushed this, whether it's all three branches of federal government, even at the state level, have been pushing this narrative to make people think that this is actually the extremism thing is a thing and it only applies to one side of the political ideology.

And so, in a sense, some folks are convinced that that's true, even though it's not.It's not based on fact.Others know that critical thinkers, I would say majority of my network, is in the Special Ops and intel community.And those that are even lean left of center when I present the evidence in a very deliberate,systematic manner, they know where I stand ideologically.They'll agree with the conclusion, which does notalign with what's being promulgated at the top.But they don't want to lose their job.They don't want to lose their benefits.It all comes down to that.It all comes down to safety, security, and they're willing to bend and budge on their moral, ethical and even legal principles."