Joe Biden Exposed In New Book | Ep. 120

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos everyday. https://www.youtube.com/c/BaldBrad

In this episode of The Bald Brad Show, President Joe Biden gets exposed in a new book that gets released on January 17th. President Joe Biden would reportedly become enraged when he would stumble across reminders of former President Donald Trump inside the White House.

The revelation was made in the forthcoming book, “The Fight of His Life: Inside Joe Biden’s White House,” by author Chris Whipple.

The Daily Mail reported that examples of remnants from the Trump administration included a big screen television and a $50,000 golf simulator that Trump personally paid to have installed that allowed him to play virtual golf on almost any golf course around the world.

“‘What a f***ing a**hole’ Biden said, showing the contraption to a guest,” Biden allegedly said to a guest while showing them one of the things that Trump left behind.

Biden reportedly has such a strong distaste for Trump that he opposes using things that the former president used, the book said. He was also reportedly paranoid that Secret Service personnel were loyal to Trump.

Earlier this month, it was revealed that scenes of illegal aliens flooding the U.S. southern border caused Biden to erupt into states of fury, dropping f-bombs in front of aides.

Furthermore, a California court issued a temporary hold on a law that would establish a board permitted to increase minimum wages received by fast food workers.

The Fast Food Accountability and Standards Recovery Act, also known as the FAST Recovery Act, would create a “Fast Food Council” responsible for drafting “sectorwide minimum standards on wages, working hours, and other working conditions,” according to a summary of the bill, which Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA) signed three months ago. The Sacramento Superior Court paused the implementation of the law, which was slated to enter into effect on January 1, and scheduled a hearing for January 13.

Save Local Restaurants, an advocacy group that garnered more than one million signatures to place the FAST Recovery Act on statewide ballots in the 2024 election, said in a press release that the court’s ruling upholds the California referendum process.

“Today’s decision by the Sacramento Superior Court protects the voices of over one million California voters who exercised their democratic right in asking to vote on a piece of legislation before bearing its burden,” the coalition said. “This process has been preserved for more than 100 years and was in grave risk of being suppressed. While this pause is temporary, the impact is beyond just one piece of legislation and keeps intact for the time being California’s century-old referendum process.”

The legislation, backed by the powerful Service Employees International Union, only applies to restaurants with 100 or more establishments across the United States, though a carveout exists for chains operating a bakery that “produces for sale bread as a stand-alone menu item.” Members of the Fast Food Council would be permitted to raise minimum wages up to $22 per hour, representing an increase of over 40% from the $15.50 minimum wage already slated to take effect in California.

Save Local Restaurants contends that the FAST Recovery Act would place an undue burden on businesses across the state and raise food prices for residents. The bill comes after many restaurants were forced to close their doors following the state’s harsh lockdown measures.

#joebiden #news #politics

FOLLOW ME:
Podcast: https://thebaldbradshow.podbean.com/
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/BaldBrad
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bald.brad/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@bald_brad?lan
Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/BaldBrad
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/TheBaldBrad

Business Inquiries: TheBaldBradShow@gmail.com

FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review, and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review, and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.