FL v Courtney Clenney - Part 4 - Amber 2.0
1 year ago
19
If the defense team wants to label this as a clear-cut case of self-defense, then (in the state of FL) they need to demonstrate that deadly force was used against Clenney - because just being afraid doesn't quite meet the state standard. Do they have the goods? Or is this another Amber Heard scenario where 'she said' but he proved her words are BS with actual evidence??
00:00 Music Intro
00:12 Let me slap you!
01:45 Police interview
03:51 Secret recording
09:47 Public video
11:06 Covert abuser
11:41 Daddy gets $2m
14:34 Daddy gets busted!
21:00 Mommy messes up the timeline
24:40 More horrific injustices
Loading comments...
-
25:20
Aussie Insider
1 year agoFL v Courtney Clenney - Part 3 - Who was on the run?
15 -
29:43
Aussie Insider
1 year agoFL v Courtney Clenney - Part 5 - Follow the Money
21 -
3:35:31
Law Talk With Mike
1 year agoCalifornia v. Lamantia Prelim Day1
13 -
3:06:43
TheBrokenBaker
10 months agoNV V. Thomas Randolph
21 -
10:58
Legal Color Commentary with Andrea Burkhart
1 year ago $0.02 earnedHow and Why did Anne Taylor get Appointed? Attorney Analysis - State v. Bryan Kohberger
3712 -
7:17:37
TheBrokenBaker
11 months agoTX v Darrin Ruben Lopez
350 -
2:19:51
TheBrokenBaker
3 months agoFl V. David Murdock
44 -
10:42
Mhiggins84
8 months agoUpcoming Boy in the Box Trial FL v Timothy Ferriter 1
1 -
1:37:06
TheBrokenBaker
10 months agoNV V. Thomas Randolph
33 -
2:26:03
TheBrokenBaker
11 months agoIL v.Bradley Yohn
7