Premium Only Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49f5c/49f5c1faff0b881b1914d2ad8cb8ce2017023e66" alt="Minion Grief Counselor: Lily Alexandre Denies that Estrogen is a Carcinogen"
Minion Grief Counselor: Lily Alexandre Denies that Estrogen is a Carcinogen
For more information about how sex hormones like testosterone, estrogen, and progesterone are known carcinogens, and how frequently providers and trans activists are nevertheless magically concluding switching won’t cause excess cancers despite profound lack of data for these experimental cross-sex applications, see this article. The genetic lesions formed by exposure to complete carcinogens, i.e. induction, which is prior to the formation of an actual cancerous cell, is known to be an irreversible process. Once you pop, the fun don’t stop. That means that men switching to the female risk profile are not actually able to abandon the male risk profile they acquired during gestation, minipuberty of infancy, and if applicable, adolescence through adulthood.
It’s beyond absurd to me that there’s any doubt that taking more carcinogens that are known to cause different cancer types in completely different tissues would somehow just average out like a light switch. It seems more likely that the Gender Jesuits believe it would not be fair if they could not transition without consequence, therefore this is how it’s got to work. That’s what faith in gender Jesus gets you. They believe there’s some fundamental core “human” that can be made male or female with drugs, ignoring the fact that there is a fundamental genetic difference between the sexes as well as the irreversible effect on future cancer risk of prior exposure to mutagenic chemicals.
Here are a few examples of medical clinics either acknoweldging, omitting or downplaying the cancer risk of estrogen to various tissue types, and generally failing to directly state that estrogen by itself causes cancers. Here are a few examples of medical clinics either omitting or downplaying the cancer risk of estrogen to various tissue types, and failing to directly state that estrogen by itself causes cancers:
For a look at the range of information regarding the carcinogenic aspect of estrogen, please see my substack. The documents range from conceding the risk, acknowledging the possibility of the risk while downplaying it, to saying that no one knows, to simply omitting it: https://exulansic.substack.com/publish/post/94162991
-
18:41
TT Exulansic
14 days agoMastectochism: The Borderline is a Scar
1.46K6 -
1:00:43
The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
6 hours agoRoger Stone Destroys Mike Pence for Attacks on Trump | The StoneZONE
90.1K35 -
1:05:43
Flyover Conservatives
1 day agoFederal Reserve on the Chopping Block—Trump’s Boldest Move Yet! - Floyd Brown, Western Journal | FOC Show
48.4K5 -
2:50:40
Melonie Mac
11 hours agoGo Boom Live Ep 38!
50.8K3 -
11:08
China Uncensored
10 hours agoXi Jinping's Greatest Fear
24.1K10 -
2:11:20
I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast
15 hours agoFar Left TROJAN HORSE | SPECIAL Forces in MEXICO | GERMANY under FIRE
19.2K13 -
1:41:00
Darkhorse Podcast
12 hours agoIf Only We’d Known: The 265th Evolutionary Lens with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying
142K34 -
1:58:29
Conspiracy Pilled
3 days agoThe Vaccine Conversation (S5 - Ep17)
59.1K2 -
11:22
Tundra Tactical
9 hours ago $3.54 earnedUSA vs Canada HOCKEY Fight: The Real PRIDE Fighting.
62.5K8 -
54:43
LFA TV
1 day agoWhy Exposing Waste and Fraud Terrifies the Beltway | TRUMPET DAILY 2.19.25 7PM
57.9K9