Bible Signs Happening - Daniel chapter 8 interpretation errors to watch out for - Part 1

So when you hear of an interpretation of Daniel chapter 8 and the ram,
look at the interpretation of the two kings.

Who are they?
Which King was first?
Which King was second?

Did the second become higher than the first?
When? How?

Are they interpreting the two horns as kingdoms or kings as it says? When were those two kings in power?
What years?

Are they trying to make it fit ancient times?

The only way they could do that is if they slice
dice, cherry pick, hop, skip, jump, twist and shout And or stuff, verse
or verses to make it fit their interpretations.

Don’t just take what they say at face value. They often leave out really important facts. Like if they are trying to make it fit the he goat being King Alexander the Great, and they say after King Alexander the Great died his kingdom was divided among his four generals… Well he had five generals. And after King Alexander the Great died, historically, his kingdom went to his half-brother Phillip and his son Alexander the IV who was born a few months later. The nation was held together by the regent Perdiccas for about 2 years, when he was assassinated. Yet, the kingdom stayed intact because Antipater became the new regent for about 2 years until Antipater died. Yet, the kingdom stayed intact because Antipater appointed Polyperchon to be the new regent. Then in 317B.C., King Philip III mis-behaved and was executed, and King Alexander the IV’s mother… the wife of King Alexander the Great, became the regent. A regent is a person appointed to administer a country because the monarch is a minor or is absent or in capacitated. In 316B.C. the former General Cassander recaptured Macedon and put King Alexander IV and his mother the regent in prison. That was about 7 years after the death of King Alexander the Great death. Even then his kingdom didn’t split into four kingdoms.