Did the Supreme Court Just Shoot Down Washington's Mandatory Waiting Period?

Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses yet another impact of New York Pistol & Rifle Assoc. v. Bruen and how this ruling could affect mandatory waiting periods that exist in Washington and several other states. When previously challenged, in cases such as Sylvester v. Becerra, which was a challenge to California's mandatory waiting periods. In Sylvester, the 9th Circuit overturned the lower court's ruling, in favor of the plaintiff, by applying the now soundly rejected, Intermediate Scrutiny. This watered down Constitutional analysis has allowed Federal Circuit Courts and State Supreme Courts to routinely uphold some of our nation's most restrictive gun measures. Does this mean that Washington's mandatory waiting periods, passed through Initiative 1639 may be on thin ice? Learn more and arm yourself with education today.
________________________________________________________________
Applicable Statutes:

RCW 9.41.092. https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9.41.092
__________________________________________________________________
Other Resources:

Sylvester v. Becerra. Justice Thomas' Dissent on Cert. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-342_4hd5.pdf

What the Supreme Court Just Did to Gun Control Today. https://youtu.be/pAdIM9L22zk

The Supreme Court Drops a Bomb on Gun Control. https://youtu.be/IpK45hpjTN8

The Pending Tidal Wave About to Crash Down on Gun Control. https://youtu.be/CiBKEdsLvwo

Check Out our Bullet Point Series. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTYlAL5t-3aPwsSwmze-Dw_ev5b7PgNpe
_________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com

Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington