Kari Lake vs Katie Hobbs Election Court Case

Katie Hobbs's lawyer gets owned by Kari Lakes technical specialist.

Context: Hobbs's lawyer is trying to argue the possibility that someone 'could' physically rub up against a printing machine and accidentally press the 'fit to printable area' or 'shrink to fit' button on the duplication ballot which would account for the 19 inch print on 20-inch ballots.

Kari Lake's technical specialist argues that this is not possible because the printer does not have a 'shrink to fit' button on the printer and that someone with Administration privileges like the Board of supervisors would have had to change this setting at the application level.

This was a monumental mistake by the Hobbs defense as the Printers used for printing duplicates don't have a physical 'shrink to fit' button on their printers like some Office printers have.