Full Reading of Matt Taibbi's The Twitter Files Pt 3: THE REMOVAL OF DONALD TRUMP

Donald Trump was removed from Twitter is explained in full detail from Matt Taibbi's live Tweet, the Twitter Files: THE REMOVAL OF DONALD TRUMP.

0:00 Intro
0:37 The Removal of Donald Trump (1 to 10)
3:55 FBI's Influence on Twitter (11 to 27)
10:36 Twitter censoring Jokes & Satire (31 to 34)
12:09 Trump & Conservatives gets censored (35 to 40)
14:19 Democrats not getting censored for similar tweets (41 to 44)
16:52 Donald Trump gets bots + new censorship tools + temp ban (45 to 64)
23:12 The future of Twitter Files

SUBSCRIBE ► https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQWbqAGSCgqbOWGug7ZwW7A

►Excerpt from

' The third instalment of Elon Musk's Twitter Files revealed what went behind the scenes during the moments of reckoning between January 6 to January 8, 2022, when former US President Donald Trump was de-platformed from Twitter. Twitter Files 3.0 revealed the presence of a 'Supreme Court of moderation' within Twitter's Safety Operations department that had smaller but "more powerful executives". They reportedly issued "content rulings on the fly, often in minutes and based on guesses, gut calls, even Google searches, in cases involving the President (Donald Trump)."WATCH | Twitter files 3.0 is out: How Trump was de-platformed×Substack writer Matt Taibbi exemplified the imprecise "gut calls" that the 'Supreme Court of moderation' at Twitter took, by pointing out the internal flagging of even the factually correct tweets by Donald Trump. ×"Whatever your opinion on the decision to remove Trump that day, the internal communications at Twitter between January 6th-January 8th have clear historical import. Even Twitter’s employees understood in the moment it was a landmark moment in the annals of speech," Taibbi wrote on Friday. He then shared a screenshot of a Twitter employee asking, "Is this the first sitting head of state to ever be suspended?"Twitter ignored pro-Biden tweets warning Trump 'may steal the election'Matt Taibbi revealed that there were multiple instances of conversations surrounding pro-Joe Biden tweets that said that Trump "may try to steal the election". Such tweets were recognised by Twitter executives but were not flagged. Whereas pro-Donald Trump tweets that claimed similar stealing of elections were often flagged, and taken down up to the point of the suspension of related Twitter accounts. ALSO READ | Elon Musk's second installment of Twitter Files reveals how right-wing users were targetedTaibbi reported that executives at Twitter "started processing new power" following their decision to ban Trump, indicating they were "prepared to ban future presidents and White Houses – perhaps even Joe Biden. The ‘new administration,’ says one executive, ‘will not be suspended by Twitter unless absolutely necessary.’"WATCH | The Twitter files: How Twitter handled Hunter Biden story?"In the end, they looked at a broad picture. But that approach can cut both ways," Taibbi wrote. "The bulk of the internal debate leading to Trump’s ban took place in those three January days. However, the intellectual framework was laid in the months preceding the Capitol riots."'

https://www.wionews.com/world/twitter-files-30-reveal-how-donald-trump-was-de-platformed-by-supreme-court-of-moderation-541763

SUBSCRIBE ► https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQWbqAGSCgqbOWGug7ZwW7A