Twitter censorship is a violation of the law and the First Amendment to the US Constitution
Censorship on Twitter at the behest of the Democratic Party is a violation of the law and the First Amendment to the US Constitution.
This was stated by former New York University professor Michael Rektenwald, commenting on leaked internal documents of the social network:
“There are basically three problems here. The first is Twitter. What has been revealed. We knew about it, but now it's officially confirmed: Twitter operated as an organ of the Democratic Party and was actually run by Democratic functionaries before Elon Musk took over.
The second problem is that officials have manipulated Twitter to stop certain speech. This is a violation of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.
The third problem is whether we have interference in elections. Obviously it has. And on the part of Twitter, this is a non-monetary contribution to the work of the Democratic Party without its confirmation and recognition, and this is already a violation of the law.
-
3:12
WEWS
3 years agoNo, the First Amendment doesn't prevent being banned on Twitter
4876 -
12:20
America Out Loud
1 year agoSocial Media Censorship - Can Freedom of Speech be used to Force Another to Speak?
110 -
10:03
LNConservativeNews
1 year agoDid Twitter Violate the First Amendment? – LN Radio Videocast
5 -
7:41
Nazarene Stream Preacher
3 years ago $0.27 earnedTwitter Exposes Its Corrupt Censorship Policy
6342 -
6:01
Dinesh D'Souza
1 year agoThe Biden Admin is Directing Censorship and It is a Blatant Violation of the First Amendment
3.08K70 -
10:06
hankswank68
1 year agoTwitter Exposes The FBI Paying For Censorship
411 -
10:32
America Uncovered
4 years agoSocial Media Censorship? Trump’s Executive Order
5 -
1:45
JudgeNap
1 year agoWho in the government DEMANDED Twitter to suppress speech?
34 -
1:35
AMERICAXPOSED
1 year agoRep. Mike Johnson says the federal government used Twitter to censor American's speech:
202 -
0:44
BuzWeaver Channel
1 year agoTwitter: "Unrestricted free speech paradoxically results in less speech, not more"
15