Chan and David Eubank's ESV Bible refuted by the textus receptus as biblical "damnable heresies"
1 year ago
31
Francis Chan and David Eubank's use the inaccurate ESV Bible that is entirely refuted by the textus receptus as biblical "damnable heresies" according to the Greek from the Syrian texts. This produces a force works based Gospel, and remember that we were warned by Christ about "false prophets and force Christ" that come "in my name" so it doesn't really matter that these men claim to be Christians as they preach or false doctrine. That is proof that they are not.
Loading comments...
-
10:36
Whole Bible Christianity
1 year agoWhole Bible Objections: It's All Good
5 -
8:46
Julian Gentry
1 year agoRefuting Terrible Bible 'Contradictions'
34 -
4:43
HBNCANAL
3 months agoLa pertinence des écritures, de la bible
4 -
3:02
CrossExamined.org
1 year agoAnother self-refuting argument against the Bible
20 -
1:07:37
Convincing Proof
1 year agoHow Do Historians Evaluate the Evidence for Jesus? (Ehrman's "Did Jesus Exist?" Part 1)
106 -
1:05:09
Convincing Proof
1 year agoHow Do Historians View the Gospels? (Ehrman's "Did Jesus Exist?" Part 3)
140 -
53:27
Convincing Proof
1 year agoDoes the Bible Have Mistakes? (Is The Bible True? Part 5)
17 -
29:42
Ember
1 year agoEvidence for the Bible: How to Blow an Atheist's Mind [part 3] | Eric Hovind
27 -
0:14
The Christian Journal
1 year agoJT Olsen "Bible Teacher" Wants to Explain Eisegesis #falseteacher #confounded #christian #dumb
16 -
7:16
LoveReigns
3 years ago $0.03 earnedBible contradictions - facing the facts...
1132