Ivermectin Could Have Saved ‘Millions’ of Lives — But Doctors Were Told Not To Use It

Letter to Dr. Andrew Hill | Dr. Tess Lawrie | Oracle Films

In October 2020 Dr. Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.

But on January 18th, 2021, Dr. Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was low quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr. Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”

The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. A media onslaught against the medicine ensued. What were Dr. Hill’s reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face?

One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it firsthand; Dr. Tess Lawrie; also features contributions from Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr. Hill during the same time frame.
⁣If you like what Oracle Films does, you can support us here: buymeacoffee.com/oraclefilms ⁣

Follow us on Telegram: t.me/OracleFilms

https://truthtellernl.wordpress.com/2022/04/21/ivermectin-could-have-saved-millions-of-lives-but-doctors-were-told-not-to-use-it/

Preliminary meta-analysis of randomized trials of ivermectin to treat SARSCoV-2 infection
Authors: Andrew Hill on behalf of the International Ivermectin Project Team*

https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-148845/v1_stamped.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2Fj7VYYjjzuJYgW2MZGQp_cdFcjA9PucEWebdUMuH8fWix-uILSYBKV5E

Dr. Andrew Hill Ph.D. is a senior visiting research fellow in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics at the University of Liverpool