What is wrong with Jesse Watters at Fox? Has ALL news gone to sh*t?

He writes this massive puff piece, using parabolic terms to try and make Nancy Pelosi's husband's DUI look even worse than it really is. He even lies, shame on you Fox for delivering such a useless one-sided puff piece.

I am not a fan of Nancy Pelosi AT ALL. She stood up there and lied about the PACT act for veterans. She used us, stood on the backs of burn pit victims that can barely breathe, to force the Senate to approve a change they made in July giving the House more money than the vets even get.

I made two videos about it. One of them is about Jon Stewart specifically because he straight-up lies in it. I thought he was being used and manipulated, but in his newest video, he states that he went to congress.gov and saw it for himself.

Well, so did I. But the difference between us Jon? I show it, I prove it, you just talk about it.

What I don't like about this piece done by Jesse Watters is that he states that Nancy's husband got off easy because of who he is. THIS IS NOT TRUE.

Fox, the defender of fair treatment for all, isn't happy that Nancy's husband received the same punishment that any other first-time offender would have.

That's the issue I have with this video. He's saying Paul Pelosi should have gotten a felony and served prison time, why? Because of who he is? Fair treatment of all no matter who you are, right Fox?

*From SuperLawyers.com: Consequences For First-Time DUI California

"Criminal charges are separate from the DMV process aimed at suspending your driver’s license.

For a first-offense DUI in California, consequences for conviction generally include three years of informal probation, fines of $390 plus “penalty assessments” (totally approximately $2000, and completing a first offender alcohol program that consists of a 30-hour class, at a cost of about $500.

There is no required jail time for a first offense when placed on probation. But it is possible to be sentenced to jail if certain aggravating factors are present, such as the presence of a minor child in the car or going 25 miles an hour or more over the speed limit on a roadway or 30 miles per hour on a freeway.

While negotiable, a first-time DUI sentence may also include required participation in a victim impact panel, community labor, or community service work.

Certain counties in California (Los Angeles, Alameda, Sacramento, and Tulare) require an ignition interlock device to be placed on your car upon a first-time conviction for four months. This can end up costing another $500."

This is almost exactly what Paul Pelosi's sentence was. Nobody was hurt, no children were involved, and he is a first-time offender. This is what the normal punishment for a DUI is in California. Period.

Why should he be treated any differently? Isn't that what we oppose? The unequal treatment of individuals according to social, political, or economical status in the court systems?

It goes both ways Watters, you can't treat him worse either.

Also, he has to pay more money than usual, so in a way, his socioeconomic status did affect his court case.

And, don't fu%$ing drink and drive!!!

As always, stay free, stay educated, keep an open mind, take a deep breath, do not let emotions like anger be your guide, stop picking sides, and be safe.

-With love and respect, your Political Professor