New threat to free speech
WHO and YouTube
https://www.who.int/teams/digital-health-and-innovation/digital-channels/combatting-misinformation-online
John’s e mail
enquiries@drjohncampbell.co.uk
WHO works with social media policy departments to ensure company policy and guidelines for content providers are fit for purpose.
WHO provide a helpful guide on how to report misinformation online
Inaccurate information spreads widely and at speed,
making it more difficult for the public to identify verified facts and advice from trusted sources, such as their local health authority or WHO.
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9795167?hl=en
As a starting point in the UK, only NHS organisations are being invited to self-certify against the NHS Standard for Creating Health Content.
By completing the self-certification process, an NHS organisation channel will be eligible for information panels indicating NHS credibility.
From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire?
https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538.full
Regulatory agencies, large proportions of their budgets,
funded by the industry they are sworn to regulate
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
1992, Prescription Drug User Fee Act, allowing industry to fund the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) directly through “user fees”
Net PDUFA fees collected
$29m in 1993
$884m in 2016 (65% of budget)
FDA, 9 out of 10 of its past commissioners between 2006 and 2019 went on to secure roles linked with pharmaceutical companies
European Medicines Agency (EMA)
Industry fees funded 20% European Medicines Agency (EMA), in 1995
By 2010, 75%
Today, 89%
Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
86% of funding from Pharmaceutical Industry
Australia
https://www.tga.gov.au
Proportion of TGA budget derived from industry, 96%
WHO funding
The second-largest funder is the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, which provides 9.8% of the WHO's funds
Appendix
https://genius.com/George-orwell-nineteen-eighty-four-appendix-the-principles-of-newspeak-annotated
https://www.orwell.ru/library/novels/1984/english/en_app
It was expected that Newspeak would have finally superseded Oldspeak (or Standard English, as we should call it) by about the year 2050
The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible.
The C vocabulary was supplementary to the others and consisted entirely of scientific and technical terms. These resembled the scientific terms in use today, and were constructed from the same roots, but the usual care was taken to define them rigidly and strip them of undesirable meanings.
War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength
Next Monday, 14th November
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/has-big-pharma-hijacked-evidence-based-medicine-tickets-444525075467
-
1:08:53
The Amber May Show
1 year agoThe Attack on Freedom of Speech | How People Get Sick May Surprise You
55 -
5:10
ConspiracyXVideos
6 months agoGovernment is still the Biggest Threat to Free Speech
1081 -
58:53
KLAUN
1 year agoFree Speech and Shutting Down the Vaccine Debate
200 -
4:51
Sprouts
1 year agoFreedom of Speech
3262 -
1:52:04
>>>FORBIDDEN INFORMATION<<<
1 year agoFree Speech 29TH dec 2022
66 -
4:45
HARPAXO
1 year agoluciferic garbage - lucifer IS the social NORM - luciferic free speech admitted at the expense of free speech
7042 -
13:29
USAFrontlineDoctors
3 months agoFROM MANDATES TO HOW TO “CONTROL THE POPULATION”, AND NOW YOUR FREE SPEECH & EVEN MORE!!” THIS IS REALLY SCARY!
3204 -
0:28
Redacted News
1 year agoDo We Really Have Free Speech?
9176 -
1:20:01
Professor Barth
2 months agoThe Free Speech Lecture
11 -
1:10:16
New Templars Mystery School
1 year agoCensorship: Threats to National Security
83