Premium Only Content
Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
LIVE
I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast
6 hours agoHalf the Gov. goes MISSING, Trump day 1 Plans, IC finally tells the Truth, Jesus was NOT Palestinian
307 watching -
4:11:49
Nerdrotic
8 hours ago $21.85 earnedThe Best and Worst of 2024! Sony Blames Fans | Batman DELAYED | Nosferatu! |Friday Night Tights 334
123K28 -
7:55:51
Dr Disrespect
12 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - WARZONE - SHOTTY BOYS ATTACK
192K27 -
1:30:23
Twins Pod
12 hours agoHe Went From MARCHING With BLM To Shaking Hands With TRUMP! | Twins Pod - Episode 45 - Amir Odom
112K29 -
1:02:30
Exploring With Nug
13 hours ago $2.34 earned2 Duck Hunters Missing After Kayak Capsizes!
43.6K2 -
46:48
Mally_Mouse
6 hours agoLet's Hang!! -- Opening Christmas gifts from YOU!
56.3K1 -
44:55
Athlete & Artist Show
20 days ago $1.99 earnedNHL 4 Nations Snubs, Was Hawk Tuah Coin A Scam?
57.1K -
33:47
Stephen Gardner
12 hours ago🔥Pentagon Whistleblower UNLEASHES on Biden and Obama!
112K176 -
2:20:30
The Dilley Show
13 hours ago $26.85 earnedRoger Stone in Studio plus Q&A Friday! w/Author Brenden Dilley 12/27/2024
93.1K20 -
1:57:02
The Charlie Kirk Show
12 hours agoThe Great H-1B Battle + AMA | Lomez | 12.27.24
178K250