Premium Only Content

Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
LIVE
Flyover Conservatives
6 hours agoRicky Schroder Exposes How Hollywood Planted Him as a Child Star | FOC Show
653 watching -
LIVE
SpartakusLIVE
2 hours agoNEW Update - BROKEN Attachment || Viewers REJOICE at the long-awaited Return of Their KING
367 watching -
6:02
Blackstone Griddles
3 hours agoPrime Rib Brisket Burgers on the Blackstone Griddle
140 -
1:14:07
Glenn Greenwald
7 hours agoGlenn Takes Your Questions: Billionaires, Bari Weiss and Journalism | SYSTEM UPDATE #509
53.4K28 -
LIVE
StevieTLIVE
1 hour agoFriday Night HYPE Warzone Games with Stevie
99 watching -
LIVE
SavageJayGatsby
22 hours agoLet's Play: Sea of Thieves | Friend Friday
138 watching -
LIVE
GritsGG
2 hours agoTop 250 Ranked Grind! Dubulars!🫡
52 watching -
19:51
Robbi On The Record
23 hours agoElectronic Tattoos Measuring Thoughts? From iPhone to iSkin
22.3K17 -
8:12
Hollywood Exposed
1 day agoJoy Behar Tried To Shame Tulsi Gabbard And Instantly FAILED
2.94K3 -
17:03
IsaacButterfield
17 hours ago $1.80 earnedBritish Man ARRESTED for Saying ‘I Love Bacon’ to a Muslim!!
3.52K6