Premium Only Content
Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
LIVE
Dr Disrespect
4 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - WARZONE x BLACK OPS 7 - SEASON 1 INTEGRATION
1,452 watching -
DeVory Darkins
3 hours agoBOMBSHELL: Congress drops BRUTAL NEWS for Tim Walz after Comer announces Probe
145K38 -
1:15:17
Sean Unpaved
3 hours agoPlayoff Implications On The Line For Cowboys vs. Lions NFC SHOWDOWN! | UNPAVED
22.4K -
59:30
Simply Bitcoin
21 hours ago $0.31 earnedThe Bitcoin Crucible w/ Alex Stanczyk & Daniel Batten - Episode 11
10.2K3 -
8:44
Jamesons Travels
17 hours ago $0.85 earnedCongress Created This Mess…Now Troops Pay the Price
8.55K15 -
1:00:13
Timcast
3 hours agoTrump DUNKS On Somalis, Calls For Ilhan Omar To Be DEPORTED
150K46 -
2:30:27
Steven Crowder
5 hours agoNick Fuentes Sits Down with Crowder
531K1.44K -
1:07:12
The Rubin Report
4 hours agoHost Gets Visibly Angry as Scott Bessent Rips Him to Shreds in Front of NY Times Crowd
64.7K37 -
4:42
Buddy Brown
5 hours ago $1.03 earnedThe Most GHETTO Chick-fil-A Customer EVER! | Buddy Brown
14.9K10 -
1:11:14
iCkEdMeL
4 hours ago $2.49 earned🔴 BREAKING: Brian Cole Identified as DC Pipe Bomb Suspect — FBI Arrest
31.6K11