Premium Only Content

Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
Kim Iversen
7 hours agoCOVID VACCINE HORROR: Fertility Destroyed & DNA Altered? | Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
7.9K28 -
LIVE
Wayne Allyn Root | WAR Zone
5 hours agoWAR Zone LIVE | 2 SEPTEMBER 2025
46 watching -
1:51:40
Redacted News
2 hours agoHIGH ALERT! TRUMP IS COMING FOR CHICAGO, U.S. TROOPS PREPARING INVASION TO STOP MURDERS | REDACTED
80.1K90 -
LIVE
Red Pill News
4 hours agoJustice Is Long Dead in The DC Circuit on Red Pill News Live
3,464 watching -
1:17:50
Awaken With JP
4 hours agoTrans Shooter is the Victim, Vaccines in Trouble, and Greta is Ugly - LIES Ep 106
40.1K16 -
2:04:31
Pop Culture Crisis
3 hours agoJK Rowling Calls Out HARRY POTTER Director, Sydney Sweeney Dating Scooter Braun? | Ep. 909
17.4K2 -
1:02:42
Sarah Westall
3 hours agoRemote Viewers: Philadelphia Experiment, Alien Abduction and Future Events w/ the Rabbit Hole Group
4.24K3 -
56:03
SGT Report
18 hours agoSILVER'S HISTORIC BREAKOUT -- Chris Marcus
32K10 -
LIVE
LFA TV
12 hours agoLFA TV ALL DAY STREAM - TUESDAY 9/2/25
1,171 watching -
19:57
Professor Gerdes Explains 🇺🇦
4 hours agoDecoding Putin's Shanghai Narrative: The Strategic Goal Behind the Lies
3.98K1