Premium Only Content

Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
LIVE
Nerdrotic
3 hours ago $4.19 earnedThe World is Burning, Let's TACO BOUT Hollywood! | Friday Night Tights 358
3,524 watching -
1:16:01
The Officer Tatum
2 hours agoLIVE: Iran RETALIATES Against Israel, NO KINGS Protest AGAINST Trump + MORE | EP 123
21.4K36 -
48:11
Sarah Westall
2 hours agoBe Prepared, Today’s Chaos & Rioting is The Calm Before a Much Bigger Storm w/ Bill Holter
5.89K -
LIVE
LFA TV
23 hours agoLFA TV FRIDAY ALL DAY STREAM 6.13.25 1
818 watching -
1:32:31
Redacted News
3 hours agoEMERGENCY BROADCAST! IS THIS WORLD WAR 3? U.S. PREPS FOR MASSIVE RETALIATION, KINGS DAY FALSE FLAGS
102K289 -
1:05:15
vivafrei
5 hours agoDemocrats Latest Political Stunt! Gavin Newsom's Premature Victory Lap! Rick Wilson is a POS & MORE!
60.7K41 -
2:01:14
Pop Culture Crisis
3 hours agoBonnie Blue BANNED, Tradwife Nara Smith BULLIED, Actress FAKES Brain Cancer?! | Ep. 856
27.5K2 -
LIVE
Akademiks
5 hours agoDiddy Trial Day 23: Kanye West Shows up to Support DIDDY n CONFRONT JANE DOE Day 5/30
1,720 watching -
11:35
Silver Dragons
2 hours agoGold Price SOARING & Fort Knox Gold Audit IMPENDING
11.6K2 -
59:56
Crypto Power Hour
11 hours ago $0.68 earnedCrypto Trading With GROK
26.4K3