Premium Only Content
Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
LIVE
Right Side Broadcasting Network
1 day agoLIVE: Election Night 2024 Coverage and Results - 11/5/24
36,975 watching -
LIVE
The Charlie Kirk Show
4 hours agoJUDGMENT DAY: The Election Results Stream
133,077 watching -
LIVE
The Quartering
6 hours agoLive Election Coverage! Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris w/ Hannah Claire
8,928 watching -
LIVE
Fresh and Fit
4 hours agoTrump VS Harris - 2024 Election LIVE Coverage
14,536 watching -
LIVE
Benny Johnson
4 hours ago🚨 LIVE Election 2024 Updates: Polls CLOSE Results Are In! Data Signal Trump Landslide, Kamala PANIC
31,306 watching -
LIVE
Graham Allen
4 hours ago🔴 LIVE NOW: Trump VS Kamala Watch Party! TONIGHT DECIDES THE FATE OF AMERICA!!
8,656 watching -
LIVE
The Rubin Report
4 hours agoThe Biggest Election Night Stream: Megyn Kelly, Ben Shapiro, Russell Brand, Jordan Peterson & More
9,403 watching -
LIVE
vivafrei
12 hours agoELECTION NIGHT LIVE STREAM! Trump. vs. Kamala - WHO WILL WIN? Viva Frei Live!
5,306 watching -
LIVE
Breaking Points
5 hours agoSTREAM BEGINS NOW! LIVE 2024 Election Coverage
1,033 watching -
LIVE
Kim Iversen
4 hours agoElection Night 2024 WATCH PARTY: The End Of Democracy™
2,216 watching