Oral Arguments in Students for Fair Admission v UNC (part 1)
Facts of the case
Petitioner Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) sued the University of North Carolina (UNC) over its admissions process, alleging that the process violates the Fourteenth Amendment by using race as a factor in admissions. UNC admits that it uses race as one of many factors in its admissions process but argues that its process adheres to the requirements for race-based admissions outlined in the Supreme Court’s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger.
After an eight-day bench trial and litigation that spanned nearly seven years, the district court ruled that UNC’s admissions policy survived strict scrutiny and was consistent with Grutter v. Bollinger. SFFA appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed.
The case was originally consolidated for oral argument with a similar case challenging the admissions policies at Harvard University under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but the Court subsequently severed the two cases.
Question
May institutions of higher education use race as a factor in admissions?
If so, does UNC’s race-conscious admissions process violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGmglDvqKzQmiCoyN61YGjw/join
★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA ★☆★
➡️ MERCHANDISE ➜ https://streamlabs.com/uncivillaw/merch
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON INSTA ➜ https://www.instagram.com/uncivil_law/
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER ➜ https://twitter.com/UncivilLaw
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON FB PAGE ➜ https://www.facebook.com/UncivilLaw
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITCH ➜ https://www.twitch.tv/uncivillaw
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON DISCORD ➜ https://discord.gg/4cYdVEs
🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://paypal.me/uncivillaw
🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ business@uncivillawllc.com
🚨 Join Uncivil Law at ➜ uncivillaw.locals.com
Tripod: https://amzn.to/3U11FWq
Camera: https://amzn.to/3KXFTyK
Travel Camera: https://amzn.to/3RrksIL
Lens: https://amzn.to/3U0Zbay
Mic: https://amzn.to/3AOC0ao
Mic Interface: https://amzn.to/3BnhMq2
Key Light: https://amzn.to/3RKRByE
Background Lights: https://amzn.to/3dIRYvo
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8
-
16:41
UncivilLaw
8 months agoTake Care of Maya - Summary of Dec. 15 hearing (stream excerpt)
1.02K -
4:09:10
Instructor Mike
1 year agoClosing Arguments in WI v. Darrell Brooks (Part 1)
4 -
2:33:20
UncivilLaw
1 year agoOral Arguments in Sackett v. EPA
1994 -
15:14
The Jill and Stacie Show
1 year agoSchool Choice Oral Arguments Recap
591 -
1:25:33
videoland
1 year agoFarmers Fair (Part I)
2 -
2:17:46
UncivilLaw
1 year agoOral Arguments in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith
99 -
4:59:47
R.C. Davis
1 year agoSupreme Court hears oral arguments in affirmative action cases (Audio)
149 -
2:00:00
Instructor Mike
1 year agoClosing Arguments in WI v. Darrell 'Objection' Brooks (Part 2) | TV Judge Mike
32 -
1:16
Snow Dog
1 year agoMorning arguments
10 -
1:17:52
Awaken With JP
1 day agoAll She Wants is Communism - LIES Ep. 52
132K135