CDC knew all major COVID jab risks in Jan. 2021... and made them difficult to report in V-SAFE app

Through Freedom Of Information requests and lawsuits, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) obtained internal documents from CDC dated Jan. 28, 2021. It shows a list of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) for the COVID injections. The list contains exactly the major categories of severe adverse events that are caused by the jabs:Show more

* Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack)
* Anaphylaxis
* Coagulapathy (blood clots, e.g. strokes, pulmonary embolisms)
* COVID (negative efficacy)
* Death
* Auto-immune disease (Guillain-Barré, Kawasaki disease)
* Hyper-inflammation: Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrom in Children (MIS-C), Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrom in Adults (MIS-A), myocarditis, pericarditis
* Narcolepsy/cataplexy
* Pregnancy and prespecified condition (e.g. reduced fertility, increased miscarriages/stillbirths, birth defects)
* Seizures/convulsions
* Neurological disease (e.g. transverse myelitis)

If the CDC were truly interested in protecting public health (instead of protecting dogma, pharma profits and political interests) and performing their public responsibility of supporting informed consent, they would clearly inform the public about these suspected safety risks.

In reality, they did no such thing. On the contrary, they kept claiming that the jabs were safe despite skipping most required safety tests and despite highly alarming safety signals from the very beginning.

Since (1) VAERS is a totally inadequate system of safety monitoring (which is by design, since the powers that be don't want to know about vaccine adverse events) with at least a 40x Under Reporting Factor (URF) due to its passive nature (among other reasons), and (2) it is an understatement to say that the introduction of the novel COVID jabs was rushed and corners were cut, a new active safety monitoring system called V-SAFE was introduced.

Human guinea pigs who took the experimental injection could opt in to this system. They would get regular reminders to answer some questions in the V-SAFE app on how they were doing. However, what they could report via multiple choice was limited to only mild adverse events such as nausea.

No severe adverse events (of special interest or otherwise) could be selected in the multiple choice lists. It was possible to write something in text fields, but this is more cumbersome and makes them less likely to be reported, especially if you are feeling unwell. CDC is fighting tooth and nail to prevent anonymized publication of the data in these text fields.

Instead of monitoring for safety signals like a hawk as CDC promised to do, they stuck their head in the sand. In fact, CDC admitted in an answer to a FOIA request that they don't even regard it as their duty to monitor safety signals (despite the agency's budget of $34 BILLION for 2021). See:

New FOIA Release Shows CDC Lied About Its VAERS Safety Monitoring Efforts | Josh Guetzkow
https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/new-foia-release-shows-cdc-lied-about

CDC only shared the safety data after a judge ordered them to. Of course, the data should have been easily available to anyone interested for informed consent.

Pro-vaxxers kept claiming that the jabs were safe. They had the dearth of severe adverse reports to support their claims (even though they tend not to let inconvenient data get in the way of their wishful claims). After all, if severe adverse events are seldom reported, it means they are occur only seldom, right? Wrong. It was never mentioned that severe adverse might not be reported, because the app made it difficult to report them.

SOURCE

Segment from:
https://rumble.com/v1qsrkw