Premium Only Content
Oral Arguments in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith
Facts of the case
Artist Andy Warhol created a series of silkscreen prints and pencil illustrations (“Prince Series”) based on a copyrighted 1981 photograph of the musician Prince, taken by Lynn Goldsmith. Warhol made some aesthetic changes to Goldsmith’s original photograph, but they remained “recognizably derived” from the original.
Goldsmith sued the Andy Warhol Foundation, successor to Warhol’s copyright in the Prince Series, for copyright infringement. The Foundation raised fair use as a defense. The district court granted summary judgment for the Foundation, concluding that Warhol had “transformed” the original photograph by giving it a new “meaning and message.” The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, holding that because the Prince Series remained “recognizably derived” from the original, it failed to transform and was thus not fair use.
Question
What is the proper test for whether a work is “transformative” under the first factor of the Copyright Act’s fair use doctrine?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGmglDvqKzQmiCoyN61YGjw/join
★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA ★☆★
➡️ MERCHANDISE ➜ https://streamlabs.com/uncivillaw/merch
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON INSTA ➜ https://www.instagram.com/uncivil_law/
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER ➜ https://twitter.com/UncivilLaw
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON FB PAGE ➜ https://www.facebook.com/UncivilLaw
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON TWITCH ➜ https://www.twitch.tv/uncivillaw
➡️ FOLLOW ME ON DISCORD ➜ https://discord.gg/4cYdVEs
🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://paypal.me/uncivillaw
🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ business@uncivillawllc.com
🚨 Join Uncivil Law at ➜ uncivillaw.locals.com
Tripod: https://amzn.to/3U11FWq
Camera: https://amzn.to/3KXFTyK
Travel Camera: https://amzn.to/3RrksIL
Lens: https://amzn.to/3U0Zbay
Mic: https://amzn.to/3AOC0ao
Mic Interface: https://amzn.to/3BnhMq2
Key Light: https://amzn.to/3RKRByE
Background Lights: https://amzn.to/3dIRYvo
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8
-
3:02:45
UncivilLaw
11 months agoSupreme Showdown: Unpacking the United States v. Rahimi Gun Rights Battle
332 -
2:33:20
UncivilLaw
2 years agoOral Arguments in Sackett v. EPA
1994 -
15:14
The Jill and Stacie Show
2 years agoSchool Choice Oral Arguments Recap
591 -
0:15
Shenzhen Pages
2 years agoAndy Warhol & Marilyn Monroe
13 -
1:03
Reuters Entertainment
2 years agoAndy Warhol inspires Tommy Hilfiger's new collection
24 -
2:55
therealamandalyn
2 years agoWarhol Art FX
5 -
10:29
TimcastIRL
1 day agoJoe Rogan SLAMS Joe Biden For ESCALATING The War In Ukraine
97.3K74 -
15:22
Russell Brand
1 day agoSO IT BEGINS.....
143K219 -
14:21
Scammer Payback
25 days agoHacked Scammer Laptop to find their location
47.3K57 -
1:07:55
Bright Insight
14 hours agoThis Happened on the JRE Podcast...
145K103