What is the Section 861 income tax argument, and why was Larken Rose sent to prison over it?
1 year ago
238
law
irs
tax
income tax
federal income tax
tax court
withholding
income
taxable income
trade or business
definition of income
"In 2005, Larken Rose DARED the Department of Justice to indict him so he could argue before a jury that the wording of Section 861 of the Internal Revenue Code means that most Americans are not required to file and pay income taxes. The jury disagreed and Larken was sent to prison for 15 months.
In this week’s Freedom Hour presentation, Peymon Mottahedeh, who founded Freedom Law School in 1996 and attended Larken’s jury trial in 2005, will explain the Section 861 argument and why Larken went to prison."
Loading 1 comment...
-
1:19:58
FreedomLawSchool
1 year agoThe TRUTH behind Peymon’s income tax court case for 2001-2006 tax years
1.02K1 -
54:30
FreedomLawSchool
1 year agoThe TRUTH behind Peymon’s income tax court case for 2001-2006 tax years (Full)
6481 -
9:32
EXPOSE & SHARE EVERYTHING
5 months agoProof we don't need to pay taxes? I think so.. Gov v. Whitey Harrell
127 -
7:53
TheRebelreport
3 months agoBold Proof A Income tax is not Constitutional
51 -
1:14
Just the News
4 months agoRep. Smith: Leaking thousands of taxpayers’ records should warrant harsher penalties
4.7K -
7:53
NpursuitofFreedom
3 months agoThe proof : Tax on your income Wages are not constitutional or lawful
16 -
36:13
FakeWokeExposure
1 year agoStop Funding Criminals And Learn The Truth About Taxes
36 -
32:57
Grant Stinchfield
1 year ago $2.24 earnedYou may never have to pay income tax again. The IRS dirty secret exposed.
2.52K14 -
8:30
WhatAboutALL
3 months agoTerrence Howard Hit with $1M Federal Tax Evasion Case, Says Slave Descendants Shouldn't Pay Taxes
208 -
36:13
Remedies 4 You
1 year agoPay ZERO Income Taxes Legally- Freedom Law School
1.05K2