Premium Only Content

( -0425 ) Why Are Leftists Naïve Enough To Support Totalitarianism? Why Are So Many Allowing The Corruptor's Minions to 'Get Away With Murder'?
Why Are Leftists Naïve Enough To Support Authoritarianism - If framed as kind-hearted Socialism? Why Are So Many Letting Fauci, Gates, Pfizer, Moderna, and the Corrupted Regulators to 'Get Away With Murder'?
When Leftists Ask You How Come You Don't Support Socialism, Ask Them, "Would You Leave Kindergarteners In A Home Full Of Bullies?"
Meanwhile the leaders of their cult have Oppidum facilities.
We're faced with a breakaway civilization that has to hide itself and manipulate the 'apparent' world you and I live in. If you've awoken to reality you know In some cases "bully" could be replaced by "murderer", "child trafficker" or worse. But the further you go from "bully" the more impossible it will be to speak with them.
Because "bully" to them is an insult affecting their leaders, to whom they feel the highest respect. For example, AOC, or Trevor Noah, or some cultural hero (to them) like Madonna or Shawn Penn. These people would never support bullies.
To them the social workers and government bureaucrats are carrying forth the ideals of such leaders. You are aware of corruption that harms children. This is something they can't attack someone for. They'll try to convince you that whatever bullying you perceive is not real.
That's where you want them. Ask them to give you examples of how they KNOW that their helpful systems are successful. They have no understanding of how the central banks create poverty or dependence, so you can gradually lead them down that rabbit hole. The really sharp ones will already know that corporations won the right to be treated as individuals over 100 years ago.
This is your point of agreement (most likely) because that victory is what helped these corporations take over power (in addition to the Federal Reserve legislation).
The reason that 5 corporations control most media is in part because of things like corporate legal arguments that preventing monopolies violated their First Amendment rights.
If they see that you are not in line with the enemy (theirs) which is capitalist systems with those enshrined corrupt laws, you have a point of agreement and can explore whether speaking with them further is worthwhile or a waste of time. If they really "process" that the corruption you point out is from the higher levels of governments, as well as financial and corporate entities, likely they are not so completely timid as to be a waste of effort. Apparently most humans don't want to face evil, so at first they may seem to 'get it' but then sheepishly back away from actually grasping the truth.
-
30:53
Clickbait Wasteland
13 hours agoAsking New Yorkers Who They Support For Mayor: Jackson Heights
522 -
23:05
Blackstone Griddles
13 hours agoEpisode 6 | Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner
276 -
1:12:00
The Car Guy Online
12 hours agoAutomakers EXPOSED, Whistleblowers SILENCED! NextGen Engineer Speaks Out!
102 -
1:17
The Lou Holtz Show
13 hours agoThe Lou Holtz Show S2 EP16 | Hugh Freeze on Faith, Football & Restoring American Values #podcast
211 -
LIVE
BEK TV
22 hours agoTrent Loos in the Morning - 8/22/2025
316 watching -
LIVE
The Bubba Army
21 hours agoHogan's Death: Bubba Called it FIRST AGAIN! - Bubba the Love Sponge® Show | 8/22/25
4,946 watching -
38:40
ZeeeMedia
16 hours agoMax Pace’s Crypto Revolution Story: Four Strategies to Win | Daily Pulse Ep 93
16.2K14 -
2:16:46
"What Is Money?" Show
2 days agoBitcoin vs War, Violence, & Corruption w/ Gary Mahmoud
11K -
28:33
DeVory Darkins
1 day ago $9.36 earnedNewsom suffers stunning EMBARRASSMENT as MAJOR retailer makes devastating announcement
21.3K61 -
32:46
Coin Stories with Natalie Brunell
2 days agoInside Look at Strategy’s $70+ Billion Bitcoin Treasury
13.1K1