Premium Only Content

Small Nuclear War if GOOD for Global Warming?
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nuclear-war-global-warming_n_828496
Could A Small Nuclear War Reverse Global Warming?
Nuclear War Could Reverse Global Warming
By Dean Praetorius
Feb 26, 2011, 12:25 PM EST|Updated May 25, 2011
Nuclear war is a bad thing.
Right?
Scientists from NASA and a number of other institutions have recently been modeling the effects of a war involving a hundred Hiroshima-level bombs, or 0.03 percent of the world's current nuclear arsenal, according to National Geographic. The research suggests five million metric tons of black carbon would be swept up into the lowest portion of the atmosphere.
The result, according to NASA climate models, could actually be global cooling.
From National Geographic:
In NASA climate models, this carbon then absorbed solar heat and, like a hot-air balloon, quickly lofted even higher, where the soot would take much longer to clear from the sky.
While the global cooling caused by superpower-on-superpower war could be catastrophic (hence the term "nuclear winter") a small scale war could have an impact on the world climate, says National Geographic. Models suggest that though the world is currently in a warming trend, small-scale war could lower global temperatures 2.25 degrees F for two-to-three years following war.
In more tropical areas temperatures could fall 5.4 to 7.2 degrees F.
But the likelihood of disaster over reversing global warming is a more imminent concern, according to TIME.
From TIME:
...even a small exchange of nuclear weapons--between 50-100 Hiroshima-sized bombs, which India and Pakistan already have their in arsenal--would produce enough soot and smoke to block out sunlight, cool the planet, and produce climate change unprecedented in recorded human history.
In addition, the extreme weather caused by even a mild nuclear winter would have a tremendous effect on crops and famines, including creating a 10 percent global decrease in precipitation, according to National Geographic. The soot could also cause tremendous harm to the ozone layer, allowing more ultraviolet rays to reach Earth.
The cons seem to outweigh the pros in the event of global cooling caused by even a small nuclear war.
-
LIVE
Redacted News
1 hour agoWhat are they hiding? New video evidence in Charlie Kirk's Shooting SHAKES FBI'S case | Redacted
11,070 watching -
41:53
Kimberly Guilfoyle
4 hours agoCharlie's Legacy and Our Mission
12.7K4 -
1:07:55
vivafrei
3 hours agoJimmy Kimmel Out Indefinitely! Trump "Srubs" Study on Right Wing Violence? Clinton Tweet & MORE
176K53 -
1:35:02
The Quartering
3 hours agoNuclear Fallout From Jimmy Kimmel Firing, New Head Of TP USA, Obama Whines
193K56 -
23:35
Jasmin Laine
2 hours ago“We Were Betrayed”—Carney HUMILIATED As His Base REVOLTS Against Him
4.15K8 -
LIVE
LFA TV
19 hours agoKIMMEL GONE | ANTIFA LABELED TERRORISTS! - THURSDAY 9/18/25
1,311 watching -
LIVE
freecastle
5 hours agoTAKE UP YOUR CROSS- Hope In GOD, and Fear NO Evil!
142 watching -
1:34:10
The HotSeat
2 hours agoChapter 32 Begins: Honoring Charlie Kirk’s Legacy & Jimmy Kimmel Gets Canceled
14.7K4 -
LIVE
The Nunn Report - w/ Dan Nunn
2 hours ago[Ep 751] Jimmy Kimmel – You’re Fired! | Freedom of Speech is Not Freedom From Consequence
210 watching -
1:28:39
Sean Unpaved
5 hours agoBills-Dolphins TNF Battle, Steelers' D in Crisis, & Coaching Hot Seat Alert!
43.8K1