Small Nuclear War if GOOD for Global Warming?
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nuclear-war-global-warming_n_828496
Could A Small Nuclear War Reverse Global Warming?
Nuclear War Could Reverse Global Warming
By Dean Praetorius
Feb 26, 2011, 12:25 PM EST|Updated May 25, 2011
Nuclear war is a bad thing.
Right?
Scientists from NASA and a number of other institutions have recently been modeling the effects of a war involving a hundred Hiroshima-level bombs, or 0.03 percent of the world's current nuclear arsenal, according to National Geographic. The research suggests five million metric tons of black carbon would be swept up into the lowest portion of the atmosphere.
The result, according to NASA climate models, could actually be global cooling.
From National Geographic:
In NASA climate models, this carbon then absorbed solar heat and, like a hot-air balloon, quickly lofted even higher, where the soot would take much longer to clear from the sky.
While the global cooling caused by superpower-on-superpower war could be catastrophic (hence the term "nuclear winter") a small scale war could have an impact on the world climate, says National Geographic. Models suggest that though the world is currently in a warming trend, small-scale war could lower global temperatures 2.25 degrees F for two-to-three years following war.
In more tropical areas temperatures could fall 5.4 to 7.2 degrees F.
But the likelihood of disaster over reversing global warming is a more imminent concern, according to TIME.
From TIME:
...even a small exchange of nuclear weapons--between 50-100 Hiroshima-sized bombs, which India and Pakistan already have their in arsenal--would produce enough soot and smoke to block out sunlight, cool the planet, and produce climate change unprecedented in recorded human history.
In addition, the extreme weather caused by even a mild nuclear winter would have a tremendous effect on crops and famines, including creating a 10 percent global decrease in precipitation, according to National Geographic. The soot could also cause tremendous harm to the ozone layer, allowing more ultraviolet rays to reach Earth.
The cons seem to outweigh the pros in the event of global cooling caused by even a small nuclear war.
-
2:49
DiggTrueInfor17
1 year ago5 billion people would die on a Nuclear war between Russia & US
54 -
2:30
ConservativeDaily
1 year agoConservative Daily: Could a Small Nuclear War Reverse Global Warming?
2043 -
7:26
PraetorPyro
1 year agoRussia's Holy War - Nuclear War - Extinction Level Event
384 -
18:24
Dr Lamba's Awakening Call
1 year agoPossibility of Nuclear War
5 -
1:57
RedpillUSAPatriots
7 months agoThe threat is not global warming it’s nuclear warming
2.77K -
3:37
All Things Future, Tech & Humanity
1 year agoChina Is Using Missiles To Fight Climate Change
12 -
5:10
PragerU
7 months agoWhich is a Greater Threat: Nuclear War or Climate Change?
1.85K7 -
3:31
RussiaInsight
1 year agoDevastating Nuclear War As Predicted By The American Scientists! 99% Population Loss in US, EU, Russia, and China
1.86K14 -
1:16
OvationEddie
8 months agoClimate Change is "MORE Frightening than NUCLEAR WAR!”
2 -
0:55
Wes Austin
9 months agoBiden Says Global Warming Is 'Even More Frightening' than Nuclear War
231