Premium Only Content

What Relative Risk Reduction REALLY Means: You've saved ONE in A THOUSAND
"Relative risk reduction is a way of exaggerating the benefits of any intervention, clearly which would be in the interest of people trying to sell you something - in this case, the pharmaceutical industry" Dr. Aseem Malhotra explains.
The REAL risk reduction (the ABSOLUTE risk reduction) for the Covid vaccines is a mere 0.84%.
You can see the full documentary on this page:
https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-287-a-second-opinion/
Oracle Films in partnership with News Uncut, present ‘Safe & Effective: A Second Opinion.’ Download and share this film. This film is being provided at no cost.
Documentary only (on the Highwire site): https://thehighwire.com/videos/safe-and-effective-a-second-opinion/
On the Oracle Films site: https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective
To Support the work of Oracle and News Uncut:
DONATE at buymeacoffee.com/oraclefilms, today!
#SafeAndEffective #OracleFilms #NewsUncut
Partial Transcript:
When vaccine efficacy was declared at 95%, relieved governments gave the green light. But Dr. Malhotra argues that the methodology was flawed.
“Relative risk reduction is a way of exaggerating the benefits of any intervention, clearly which would be in the interests of people trying to sell you something, in this case the pharmaceutical industry. So if, for example you have a thousand people in a trial that didn't have the vaccine, vs a thousand people that did, in the placebo group, in the dummy group. you may have two people dying, and in the intervention group you may have just one person dying. And that's a reduction of 50%, one over two is a 50% relative risk reduction, but actually I've only saved one life out of 1000, so the absolute risk reduction is only one in a thousand… it’s a big difference.”
‘The guidance has been, for many years, that we must always use absolute risk reduction in conversations with patients, not just relative risk reduction alone, otherwise it's considered unethical.”
The accusation is that governments acted on Pfizer's relative risk figure of 95% efficacy when the absolute risk was a mere 0.84%. In other words, you'd have to vaccinate 119 people to prevent just one from Catching Covid.
“So we were basically sold him something that ultimately, in retrospect in retrospect now, was very, very misleading.”
-
25:24
marcushouse
2 hours ago $0.42 earnedStarship Test Trouble… and Block 3 Finally Unveiled! 🤯
3.84K4 -
33:10
Vedic compatability astrology
5 days ago"The mystery of Austin Muhs Explained"
18 -
1:13:26
Squaring The Circle, A Randall Carlson Podcast
9 hours agoSaving The Bees and Healing The Planet!
2.82K1 -
16:18
Chris Harden
2 days agoCharlie Kirk Utah Reaction | What Locals Are Saying
4K5 -
50:47
ChurchandState1776
19 hours agoFree speech is not negotiable with Sam Anthony
2.23K2 -
16:59
Chris From The 740
19 hours ago $2.43 earnedIs Bigger Better? - The Gideon Optics Mediator 2 Is Here!
16K2 -
7:58
Blackstone Griddles
16 hours agoTennessee Mountain Burgers on the Blackstone Griddle
17.8K3 -
43:32
NAG Daily
17 hours agoThe Rezendes Rundown Ep. 17 - Epstein's Birthday Book
14.1K6 -
9:28
Freedom Frontline
21 hours agoEric Schmitt Drops DAMNING Biden Video And The Media PANICS
14.5K19 -
24:49
DeVory Darkins
1 day ago $33.49 earnedTrump drops shocking news on Omar as DC Mayor gets humiliated during painful hearing
157K196