Bill S-3076 - The Refusal to Protect Infant Boys

Video thumbnail from Bloodstained Men's social media.

The article I am reading off of:

https://www.senatenj.com/index.php/durr/durr-introduces-child-protection-and-anti-mutilation-act/58380

It's not that Bill S-3076 ignores MGM.
It's that it tells you in text that it must be ignored.

I will support no "anti-genital mutilation" initiative that doesn't include infant male genital mutilation, or worse, deliberately makes exception to male genital mutilation.

To support such a thing is to say that "I don't recognize brutality against male infants as a mutilation" and I cannot abide by that. It will be to literally affirm that the act is not a problem.

To support this bill is an indicator that the supporter has read everything stated plainly here, and is in effect supporting both the notion that circumcision is a removal of a healthy body part AND we should just let people inflict it on their sons.

I don't monetize my videos because I don't believe in being beholden to YT and how they could yank my monetization for no good reason at any moment. Instead support me here, $1 would mean very much to me and will help me carry on: https://www.subscribestar.com/v-for-vernon