Was the late Roman Army weak, ineffective and inferior to the early Legions?

1 year ago
45
fall of rome how did rome fall why did rome fall byzantine empire Constantinople fall of the roman empire the middle ages roman emperor roman emperors eastern roman empire late roman empire

Use my link https://get.atlasvpn.com/Maiorianus to get Atlas VPN exclusive deal with 82% OFF!
(30-day money-back guarantee) 😉

🔴 YOU WANT TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL? 🔴
🤗 Join our Patreon community: https://www.patreon.com/Maiorianus

🤗 One-Time Donation?
- PayPal: https://paypal.me/Maiorianus
- Bitcoin: bc1qv4lsfsplvfecrrgvmfclhga28we7mvh9563xdj
🔗 Share the video with anyone who might be interested (it helps a ton!)
👍 Subscribe to our videos FOR FREE!

📬 Contact us: maiorianus.sebastian@gmail.com

As we have discussed many times on this channel, there are many reasons for the Fall of the Roman Empire, there is not one single big reason. And one of those reasons is sometimes said to be, that the late roman army was weak, undisciplined, and ineffective. That the late Romans were only inferior, degenerate versions of the glory days when the legions were a very disciplined formidable fighting force, that the late Roman army was but a mere shadow of its former self, that the late roman army was inferior in fighting skill, in equipment, and through and through barbarized. And thus that it was absolutely no wonder that the Western Roman Empire fell in the 5th century, since how could such a pitiful army defend so vast an empire against so many barbarian invaders? Well, friends of late Roman history, I hope I can convince you in this video, that all these accusations against the late Roman army could not be further from the truth.

Loading 1 comment...