The Argument From Reason Naturalism Refuted Part 1
1 year ago
8
Many atheists believe that argumentation can prove that God doesn't exist. But if Naturalism is true, human reasoning ability is unreliable on a fundamental level and can't prove anything, let alone theological or metaphysical claims. Hence, Naturalism is self-refuting, for it undermines any confidence we might have in our ability to defend it. If we are to trust our reasoning ability, it must be grounded in something other than random mutation and natural selection. Theism offers such a foundation.
Loading comments...
-
11:28
InspiringPhilosophy
1 year agoEvolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (An Introduction)
32 -
4:54
xMoonBeams
11 months agoArguments Against God's Existence
3 -
13:10
InspiringPhilosophy
1 year agoAnswering Objections to the Ontological Argument (Part 1)
43 -
30:00
FTWorthCrossTalk
5 months agoThe Epistemological Problem with Atheism
10613 -
4:04
Genetically Modified Skeptic Channel Archive
1 year agoIf Atheists Argued Like Theists
434 -
12:29
InspiringPhilosophy
1 year agoAnswering Objections to the Ontological Argument (Part 2)
27 -
11:04
truthdebate
1 year ago4 Powerful Reasons Debunking Evolution
3365 -
3:37
Word of Grace Studies
2 years agoDisputing Evolution in the Creation of Man
65 -
11:52
DOES GOD EXIST
1 year agoATHEIST ASKS SUPPOSED UNANSWERABLE QUESTION: DOES GOD CHOOSE TO DROWN CHILDREN?
962 -
1:07:53
Convincing Proof
3 months agoDoes Evolution Prove There's No God? (Apologetics for Teens Part 3)
95