Biden Admin Suppressed Spike Protein Warnings!!!, 3924

Good afternoon, I’m still reporting on the coup.Show more

In his latest bombshell, Dr. Joseph Mercola analyzed the latest info coming out of the ongoing lawsuit being conducted by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, Eric Schmitt and Jeff Landry against resident Biden filed in May of 2022.

The preliminary results of this ongoing investigation are stunning, but encouraging for the fate of the Union, but thank God for Dr. Mercola consuming the prodigious output and synopsizing it in a way that the wider public can take it in. According to Dr. Mercola’s summary:

“Federal officials in the Biden administration have held secret and illegal censorship meetings with social media companies to suppress Americans’ First Amendment rights to free speech, and to ban or deplatform those who share unauthorized views about COVID and vaccines.”

“[Monthly meetings] took place — and may still be taking place — between a wide variety of government agencies and Big Tech companies, during which topics to be censored and suppressed were/are discussed.”

Favorite topics to be censored were:
• COVID job refusal
• Strategies to suppress military refusals to take the jab
• Criticisms of COVID restrictions
• COVID positive tests among recipients of COVID vaxxes
• COVID jab adverse events, including menstrual irregularities
• Opposition to mandatory COVID vaccine passports

The investigation has identified more than 50 federal employees across 15 federal agencies engaged in illegal censorship activities. In addition, outside consultants were hired to manage the government’s collusion with social media to violate Americans’ rights of free speech.

Yes, it’s now a documented fact that federal officials in the Biden administration have held secret censorship meetings with social media companies to ban or deplatform those sharing unauthorized perspectives about COVID and vaccines. The assumption – though yet proven – is that a similar system has been setup to suppress those who believe Election 2020 was rigged in any way.

According to documents produced by the Schmitt and Landry investigation, secret meetings were held by something called the Unified Strategies Group, or USG, and big tech companies to discuss who, what, and how unfavored views on COVID would be suppressed.

“... scores of federal officials ... have secretly communicated with social-media platforms to censor and suppress private speech which federal officials disfavor. This unlawful enterprise has been wildly successful.

“Under the First Amendment, the federal government may not police private speech nor pick winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas. But that is precisely what the government has done — and is still doing — on a massive scale not previously divulged.

“Multiple agencies’ communications demonstrate that the federal government has exerted tremendous pressure on social-media companies — pressure to which companies have repeatedly bowed ...

“… these federal officials are fully aware that the pressure they exert is an effective and necessary way to induce social-media platforms to increase censorship. The head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency even griped about the need to overcome social-media companies’ ‘hesitation’ to work with the government ....”

As Jenin Younes, a litigation counsel for the New Civil Liberties Alliance put it:

“If there was ever any doubt the federal government was behind censorship of Americans who dared to dissent from official COVID messaging, that doubt has been erased. The shocking extent of the government’s involvement in silencing Americans, through coercing social-media companies, has now been revealed ....”

According to emails from Reingold, a strategic communications and marketing firm:

“… outside consultants were hired to manage the government’s collusion with social media to censor Americans. For example, Reingold set up a “partner support portal” for the CDC so that CDC officials could link emails to the portal for easier flagging of content it wanted censored by social media companies linked to the portal.”

Why haven’t we heard much of this before? The White House has successfully stonewalled release of critical emails regarding the state censorship gambit, especially communications to and from Dr. Anthony Fauci, claiming that all White House communications are “privileged”.

However, the investigators asserted that executive privilege does not apply to external communications, and on Sept. 7, 2022 – that’s last Wednesday – federal judge Terry Doughty agreed and ordered the White House to hand over any and all relevant records within 3 weeks – that means by Sept. 28.

It may well turn out that the attempt to create a DHS Disinformation Governance Board was to disguise this behavior which was already well underway within the U.S. government.

For example, Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg, was an early and enthusiastic member of this Biden/media/bigtech cabal when COVID vaxxes were first rolled out:

“The CDC also coordinated with Facebook, providing them with talking points to debunk various claims, including the claim that spike protein in the COVID shots is dangerous and cytotoxic. In a July 28, 2021, email, a CDC official provided Facebook with the following counter-narrative, taken straight from the “How mRNA Vaccines Work” section on the CDC website:14
‘Messenger mRNA [sic] vaccines work by teaching our cells to create a harmless spike protein ….’

However, it is now a proved fact that this is not true. The spike protein multiplies in the blood vessels, attacks their linings – the endothelium - and slows blood flow.

But this wording was changed by the CDC last June by removing the entire section that the spike protein did not last more than a few weeks in the body.

What to do about all of this? Three Republicans have introduced legislation to prevent federal employees from asking or encouraging private entities to censor private speech or otherwise discourage free speech, and impose penalties, including civil fines and disciplinary actions for government employees who facilitate social media censorship.

As Dr. Mercola puts it:

“While the U.S. Constitution clearly forbids government censoring and restricting free speech, HR. 8752 could be a helpful enforcement tool, as people might tend to think twice when they know there’s a real and personal price to pay.”

I’m still reporting from just outside the citadel of freedom. Good day.