Premium Only Content
Interest Of Justice 90 Second Video To The WHO/INB Pandemic Treaty, September 9, 2022
Interest Of Justice 90 second video to the WHO/INB on the "New international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response: contributing to the second round of public hearings at the WHO/INB"
Here is the question from the WHO/INB in which IOJ is responding:
"Based on your experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, what do you believe should be addressed at the international level to better protect against future pandemics?”
90 second video transcript by IOJ:
"Interest of Justice experience in the declared COVID-19 pandemic was a loss of health from unnecessary limitations on rights not strictly required by the exigencies of the situation
Ordinary administrative measures and treatments were always available to treat covid-19, but were not utilized in order to declare the pandemic.
The treaty is intended to re-define pandemic, despite the word being already defined in customary law.
The WHO concedes that a pandemic cannot be controlled, therefore, If the WHO were to try to better prevent future pandemics they would not only be going against the unequivocal rules of science, they would be going against their previous COVID-19 declaration of pandemic where the WHO confessed that a pandemic cannot be controlled.
To protect health in the future there should be no centralized international level healthcare system and blanket measures are presumed disproportionate on their face.
To respect the sovereignty of each country as well as meet the who’s obligations to the IHR article 3 section 4, The control and management of pandemics should be left to each individual nation to handle in the way that their sovereign legislators intended in their own regulations.
The WHO unilaterally lowered the bar for the word pandemic by omitting the one essential element required by the common law, which is the essential element of “great danger to life, or high mortality rate”.
The WHOs definition of pandemic wrongfully allows for the imposition of measures merely because of an apprehension of potential danger, violating article 54 of the Siracusa principles. Resolving this breach of WHOs obligations must be addressed before any pandemic treaty is drafted."
There is much more that IOJ wanted to say but didn't get the due process to explain why it was a fools errand. So below is the transcript of what IOJ expressly wanted to say in regards to the WHO's question to the public.
Ordinary administrative measures and treatments were always available to treat covid-19, which makes a declaration of pandemic in violation of international law, however the unnecessary measures were Imposed merely because of The Who’s apprehension of potential danger.
The WHO declared the pandemic while they say pandemic was not defined, which is arbitrary and capricious on its face and especially shocking because Tedros declared march 11 2020 and we quote:
“We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic. Pandemic is not a word to use lightly or carelessly. It’s a word that if misused can cause unreasonable fear leading to unnecessary suffering and death. This is the first pandemic caused by a coronavirus and we have never before seen a pandemic that can be controlled at the same time.”
Below is the information so you can submit your own video to the WHO/INB:
You are invited to submit a video statement of up to 90 seconds, accompanied by a transcript, in response to the following guiding question:
"Based on your experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, what do you believe should be addressed at the international level to better protect against future pandemics?”
Statements can be submitted in any of the six official WHO languages (English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, Chinese).
The submission period will open on Friday 9 September and will close on Tuesday 13 September 2022.
Further information about the registration process, the terms and conditions for participation, and the process to submit a video statement is available at https://inb.who.int/home/public-hearings/second-round
WHO will broadcast two three-hour segments of a selection of compiled video statements on the WHO website – https://inb.who.int on 29 and 30 September 2022. Other video statements will be made available on the WHO website following the hearings.
Interest of Justice video tutorial on submitting the video: https://rumble.com/v1izqtb-notice-w.h.o.-is-accepting-your-90-sec.-video-september-9-13-2022-pandemic-.html?mref=138ft6&mc=6x039
http://www.interestofjustice.org
Support the cause! https://interestofjustice.org/donation
-
6:33
Interest Of Justice
1 month agoInterest Of Justice Coalitions forming to 'Stop The WHO Pandemic Treaty
2003 -
17:25
TimcastIRL
10 hours agoDOJ, FBI Officials Are LAWYERING UP, FEARING Prosecutions From Matt Gaetz & Trump
27.7K121 -
13:50
Tundra Tactical
2 hours agoILLINOIS Assault Weapon Ban OVERTURNED!!! (for now)
691 -
LIVE
LFA TV
23 hours agoTrump Dance Syndrome | Trumpet Daily 11.19.24 7PM EST
731 watching -
1:31:38
Redacted News
4 hours agoBREAKING! NATO ATTACKS RUSSIA & DEFIES TRUMP'S CALL FOR PEACE, PUTIN NUCLEAR RESPONSE | REDACTED
119K280 -
10:05
The Gun Collective
3 hours agoAre Gun Companies SMOKING DRUGS? - TGC News!
3.82K2 -
1:24:24
Criminal Content
4 hours agoTHE DARK KNIGHT (2008) Movie Reaction w/ Coby FIRST TIME WATCHING
15K8 -
48:21
FULL SEND PODCAST
4 hours agoStephen A. Smith Calls out the Democrats and REVEALS LeBron Will Retire Next Year!
33.6K1 -
51:14
Candace Show Podcast
4 hours agoBREAKING! Diddy Private Investigators Offer Money To Influencers | Candace Ep 106
84.7K223 -
1:03:22
In The Litter Box w/ Jewels & Catturd
22 hours agoWW3 WATCH | In the Litter Box w/ Jewels & Catturd – Ep. 694 – 11/19/2024
63.4K15