THE ONLY MAGNETIC FLOATING HOVER BED EVER MADE

Have you ever had a dream of floating or flying in mid-air? Dutch architect, Janjaap Ruijssenaars, wanted to make this dream a reality with an anti-gravity, magnetic bed. He has finally succeeded after spending 6 long years on it and the final decided price of $1.6 million makes it the most expensive bed ever built...

DO NOT TOUCH 👉 https://bit.ly/MysteryLink_

Help us Reach 100k Followers on INSTAGRAM
👑 https://bit.ly/theluxuryarchetypes 👑
👑 https://bit.ly/theluxuryarchetypes 👑

💌 Business Inquiries: theluxuryarchetypes@gmail.com

00:00 Intro
00:34 Why Does It Cost So Much?
02:08 How Does It Work?
03:42 IT'S NOT SAFE GUYS!
05:04 The Mastermind Architect
06:35 Other Hover Beds Options
08:05 Outro

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATCH NEXT:

The MOST EXPENSIVE Phone In The World:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBVzTLcTrjg

Elon Musk's NEW Invention: The Tesla Model Pi Phone:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3TQxdJz-Ck&t=37s

$545,000 Fazioli 24K Gold Leaf Luxury Piano
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pizGxavLMcI

THE MOST EXPENSIVE THINGS IN THE WORLD:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8J8tLUrHi0&list=PLoFxNnhwW2z8ui00syLT4RvRO_ECekZZ8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#magneticbed #floatingbed #luxurybed #luxurybedroom #bed #antigravity

DISCLAIMER: We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage which is incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of reading any of our publications. You acknowledge that you use the information we provide at your own risk. Do your own research.

RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. ” This video and our youtube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder (s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.