Premium Only Content

Dr. Drew may need to get another jab this fall despite no medical benefit, previous adverse effect
Dr. Kelly Victory explains that NONE of the requirements for the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the COVID jabs have been met:
1. THERE MUST BE A MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Clearly this is not the case at the present time. In fact, there has never been a medical emergency for the vast majority of the population.
2. THE JABS MUST BE EFFECTIVE. To anyone who has looked at the data, it's obvious that the jabs don't have any benefit for protecting both the injected and others (in fact, they're counter-effective), and therefore also have no benefit for the sick care system.
3. THERE MAY BE NO ALTERNATIVES. The reality is that we have countless harmless, highly effective, available, cheap pharmaceutical an non-pharmaceutical alternatives for prevention and treatment. We have known of them since at least March of 2020.
See the relevant official FDA source text below.
----
EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION FOR VACCINES TO PREVENT COVID-19: GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY
CHAPTER 3: Criteria and considerations for the issuance of an EUA for a COVID-19 vaccine
Based on this declaration and determination, FDA may issue an EUA after FDA has determined that the following statutory requirements are met (section 564 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3)) (Ref. 3):
- The chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) agent referred to in the March 27, 2020 EUA declaration by the Secretary of HHS (SARS-CoV-2) can cause a serious or lifethreatening disease or condition.
- Based on the totality of scientific evidence available, including data from adequate and wellcontrolled trials, if available, it is reasonable to believe that the product may be effective to prevent, diagnose, or treat such serious or life-threatening disease or condition that can be caused by SARS-CoV-2.
- The known and potential benefits of the product, when used to diagnose, prevent, or treat the identified serious or life-threatening disease or condition, outweigh the known and potential risks of the product.
- There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.
https://www.fda.gov/media/142749/download
----
So if none of the requirements have been met, why are the jabs still being marketed, recommended, and the unwilling even raped by injection? Because the authorities implicitly claim that the requirements have been, despite all the data to the contrary. The Ministry of Truth determines the truth, not the data.
In the second part of the discussion, dr. Drew explains that he may need to get another jab in the fall and that he is terrified for the possible adverse effects. He explains that he has already had COVID twice, so he has natural immunity, which the best possible form of protection. Therefore, an extra jab cannot provide any medical benefit.
Also, he has has a severe adverse effect from a previous jab which gave him 'raccoon eyes'.
Dr. Peter McCullough adds that a basic principle in medicine is that if someone has already experienced an adverse effect, such as to penicillin or contrast dye, these should not be used anymore in that person.
It is now so bad that peanuts are not served anymore in planes, because of the tiny risk that even one person might have an allergic reaction.
However, with respect to the COVID shots, there is medical tyranny. They are forced on anyone, even though they're unnecessary, life-threatening, and counter-effective. It would be like forcing everyone to eat peanut butter, even those who have known allergies to peanuts and would have an anticipated fatal reaction.
Dr. Drew says that he may get jabbed anyway, because of travel requirements.
Speaking for myself, health and (medical) freedom are paramount. You must stand up to tyranny, not comply. Theoretical circumstances are possible where no alternatives exist, but in the vast majority of cases, there are better alternatives to risking your life and freedom. Civil disobedience absolutely has (significant) downsides, but in my opinion the alternative is worse in almost all circumstances.
-
2:49:10
TimcastIRL
6 hours agoElon Musk Says X Hit By MASSIVE Cyberattack From Ukraine, Rumble Hit Too w/Ben Davidson| Timcast IRL
153K75 -
2:05:10
Kim Iversen
8 hours agoFree Speech for Me, But Not for Thee: Trump Admin’s Protester Crackdown Sounds MAJOR Alarms
59.2K217 -
1:29:26
Glenn Greenwald
8 hours agoICE Detains Permanent Resident for Protesting Israel; European Leaders Make Maniacal Rearmament Vows They Cannot Keep | SYSTEM UPDATE #421
107K172 -
1:02:56
Donald Trump Jr.
10 hours agoUSAID Slush Fund Slashed, X Cyberattack, Plus Interview with Nate Morris | Triggered Ep.223
124K109 -
5:48:40
Dr Disrespect
14 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - THE SHOTTY BOYS - WARZONE, PUBG, FORTNITE
204K41 -
2:12:50
Adam Carolla
15 hours agoDouble Murder Convict to be executed by Firing Squad + Comedian Elon Gold + Comedian Carol Leifer
76.3K4 -
46:08
Kimberly Guilfoyle
11 hours agoBad Day to be a Bad Guy: FBI Taking Down World’s Worst Criminals, Live with John Nantz | Ep.203
161K59 -
DVR
Redacted News
10 hours agoWhat's REALLY going on in Syria? | Redacted with Natali Morris
172K128 -
54:18
Candace Show Podcast
10 hours agoHarvey Speaks: Jessica Mann & The Five Year Affair | Ep 3
182K83 -
56:53
Grant Stinchfield
9 hours ago $7.37 earnedFreeze Spending & Kick the Can Down the Road... Why Republicans Should do Just That!
95.9K15