Poll: Nearly 83 Percent of Voters Back Second Amendment Self-Defense Principles | Supreme Court Chat

#supremecourt #2ndamendment #2nd #nra #constitution #twitter
Nearly 83% of voters say the Second Amendment was adopted to protect self, family, and property, and to protect against government tyranny, according to a poll conducted by Trafalgar/Convention of States.
Nearly 56% said the Second Amendment was adopted to protect self, family, and property, while 29.2% said it was adopted to protect against government tyranny.
The Supreme Court on Thursday in a 6-3 decision struck down a New York gun law that restricted the right of firearm possession to people who could show some “special need.”
The century-old law said permits to carry guns in public could only be granted to applicants who demonstrated “proper cause,” which was challenged in court by two New York gun owners who said it was highly discretionary and unconstitutional.
The two were granted a limited license for concealed carry but the state barred them from possessing a weapon in places frequented by the public.
Justice Clarence Thomas in the majority opinion wrote that the Second and 14th Amendments protect an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.
"The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not 'a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees,'” Thomas wrote. "We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need."

I do almost daily videos on many subjects, different views and attempt to look outside the box into the real reason of why things happen.
Follow me down this journey by hitting the
SUBSCRIBE, COMMENT YOUR THOUGHTS AND SHARE THIS VIDEO.
MORE TO COME, ITS GETTING INTERESTING.
DISCLAIMER
This video is for entertainment purposes ONLY & designed to help your thinking, not direct it. These videos shall NOT be construed as tax, legal or financial advice and may be outdated or inaccurate; all decisions made as a result of viewing are yours alone.
This is Educational, documentary, scientific and/or has artistic content. This content is being shown in an open public forum, such as a protest or public hearing. This content does not aim to promote misinformation that violates YouTube policies.
OUR RIGHT TO FAIR USE: I can use this content because of the right to "Fair Use" "Fair use for the purpose of criticism, commentary, satire, news reporting, teaching, education, and research."