Kim Iversen: Why I'm No Longer On The Hill's Rising (She Wasn't Allowed To Interview Anthony Fauci)

1 year ago

Kim Iversen describes leaving The Hill because they wouldn't allow her to interview Anthony Fauci.

Video One:

Kim Iversen: Why I'm No Longer On The Hill's Rising

Video Two:

Hang On, Fauci Did WHAT?!


Kim Iversen: What I Would Have Asked Fauci If I'd Been Allowed to Interview Him

In a recent interview with Russell Brand, Kim Iversen said she's no longer co-host of The Hill's "Rising" because she wasn't allowed to interview Dr. Anthony Fauci.

The Defender
By Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
August 17, 2022

Political commentator Kim Iversen was excited when she learned the news show she co-hosted, The Hill's "Rising," had booked Dr. Anthony Fauci for an interview — until the night before the interview, she learned she wouldn't be allowed to participate.

"I'm not on 'The Hill' because they would not allow me to interview Anthony Fauci," Kim Iversen told Russell Brand during a recent interview about why she left The Hill.

Iversen said she doesn't know for certain who was responsible for the decision — whether Fauci's team said he wouldn't come on the show if she did the interview, or if her producers didn't present her name to Fauci's team, for fear he'd back out.

All she knows is that the night before the interview was to take place, her producers said she wouldn't be part of it.

Iversen told them, "That's unacceptable," because, after all, she'd been covering COVID-19 "at length" for the show.

When she joined The Hill, Iversen said she knew she was "joining corporate media" and therefore "part of the establishment to some degree," she told Brand.

But she also told her producers, and her audience, that she wouldn't remain on the show if she were "censored, held back or limited."

"The minute that was to change was the minute that I would no longer be able to be there," she said. "That would make me a liar to the audience."

'Does Anthony Fauci refuse to answer difficult questions?'

Iversen said she was excited to interview Fauci because "he is the person who guided the pandemic that put us in these limitations and mandates."

She added:

"Our lives have drastically changed since the pandemic in many ways, and Fauci was the guiding force on a lot of that."

As director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, U.S. government authorities looked to him to manage the pandemic.

Initially an HIV/AIDS researcher — as discussed in Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s book, "The Real Anthony Fauci" — Fauci has advised seven U.S. presidents and is now chief medical advisor to President Biden.

Fauci on Aug. 2 told Fox News he symbolizes "consistency," "integrity" and "truth."

Not everyone agrees.

"As the world watched," Kennedy wrote in his book, "Tony Fauci dictated a series of policies that resulted in by far the most deaths, and one of the highest percentage COVID-19 body counts of any nation on the planet."

Kennedy added:

"Only relentless propaganda and wall-to-wall censorship could conceal his disastrous mismanagement during COVID-19's first year."

Brand said he thinks high-paying public officials like Fauci, who wield great amounts of power, should be held up to public scrutiny.

Brand emphasized the need for "transparency between powerful people that make decisions and the media that report on the decisions that are being made, so that we — the ordinary people of the world — are able to be part of a conversation regarding how we are governed."

"What interests me about this subject is, Does Anthony Fauci refuse to answer difficult questions?" Brand said.

Brand wondered whether Fauci was avoiding answering tough questions about "things like natural immunity, recommendation of vaccines for those under 5 [years of age], their clinical data and whether the clinical data underwrites the decision to extend the vaccine program to young people."

What would Iversen have asked Fauci, had she been allowed to interview him?

• "What is a 'vaccine' to Fauci?"

• "How much protection do we get? How long does it last?"

• "Why are we not doing comprehensive studies on natural immunity?"

• "Why are we not doing studies on comprehensive therapeutics that are out there?"

• "Why did you not separate those who are most vulnerable from those who are not, like school children, and why did you instead say, 'no, everybody has to do this [i.e., wear a mask, get the vaccine]?'"

Iversen expressed frustration at the "narrative" around COVID-19 and the "lack of ability to ask questions."

"They [Fauci and his team] were not interested, it seems," Iversen told Brand, "in finding out any of those questions and getting answers for us. Instead, it was just: 'No, take this,' make Big Pharma a bunch of money and silence to any of us who actually questioned it."

Iversen also would like to have asked Fauci if he, himself, could generate any critical questions to ask.

"Does he have any at all?" she asked. "Because it doesn't feel like there are any coming from him."


Kim Iversen Links:

Instagram: @KimIversen
Facebook: @KimIversenOfficial


Russell Brand Links:



Kim Iversen: Latest Pfizer Data Dump Shows Natural Immunity WORKS - ADE, Fertility Issues Unknown

Kim Iversen: The Dark Side Of The World Economic Forum, Young Global Leaders & Digital IDs

Kim Iversen: Fauci & Collins COLLUDED To Smear Scientists, SHUT DOWN Scientific Debate

Loading 12 comments...