Indiana mall shooting and the case against "gun-free zones"
1 year ago
180
A 22-year old was able to stop a targeted attack on an Indiana mall on Sunday, but only because he violated the mall's "no weapons" policy and was carrying a handgun of his own. While the armed citizen isn't likely to face chargers, the defensive gun use is another demonstration that "gun-free zones" don't stop violent criminals, but could prevent law-abiding citizens from acting in self-defense or the defense of others.
Loading 5 comments...
-
24:03
Bearing Arms' Cam & Company
1 year agoGun control reaction to Indiana armed citizen anything but "reasonable"
1755 -
24:08
Alpha Koncepts Firearm Training
1 year agoIllinois Gun Free Zones and Penalties Explained.
21 -
5:35
Colion Noir
1 year agoThis Shooting At A Dallas Hospital Is Why I Hate Gun Free Zones
1.41K26 -
3:36
TheGunHor
8 months agoGun-Free Zones: Creating Victims Not Solutions
1 -
2:15
WRTV
6 years agoIndiana considers allowing guns without a license
1 -
5:35
hankswank68
1 year agoThis Shooting At A Dallas Hospital Is Why I Hate Gun Free Zones
23 -
9:56
ChapStillwater
1 year agoGreenwood Park Mall Shooting Destroys Gun Control Narrative
126 -
1:14
FlyingRich
4 years agoSolution for "Gun Free Zones"
2 -
5:08
hankswank68
1 year agoArmed Citizen Stops Mall Shooting Once Again In El Paso, Texas
5291 -
0:52
KERO
1 year agoWhat we know about the armed civilian who killed Indiana mall gunman
382