Dr. Andrew Wakefield: No safety studies on combination vaccines, erroneously assumed to be safe

When dr. Andrew Wakefield got involved with the MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) combination vaccines, he asked prof. David Salisbury (director of immunisation at the Department of Health in the UK until the end of 2013) about comparison studies between the single measles vaccine and the MMR combination vaccine.Show more

Salisbury answered, "We have no reason to ASSUME that the safety of the triple vaccine would be any less than the single vaccine". There is no valid medical justification for this assumption, since you're putting these viruses together in a combination that nature has never seen them throughout history.

What a disgrace to mass inject children with a vaccine and rely on a mere ASSUMPTION of safety. When more science is published that combination vaccination makes a difference, you still don't do safety testing?!

There is a term called 'GRAS': Generally Recognized As Safe. The evil corporation Monsanto has gotten the authorities to apply this term to their weed killer RoundUp (which contains glyphosate among other substances). RoundUp is almost certainly very harmful to health of human and other (beneficial) living organisms.

NB: See dr. Stephanie Seneff's book, 'Toxic Legacy: How the Weedkiller Glyphosate Is Destroying Our Health and the Environment' for more information.

If the authorities truly cared about public health, they would have demanded rigorous safety tests instead of merely assuming RoundUp to be safe. The safety tests would have shown what they almost certainly know to be the case: that RoundUp is highly toxic to humans and other living organisms. This would have meant an enormous financial blow to Monsanto.

Since the authorities actually work for the corporations they are supposed to police (regardless of their mandate and regardless of what they say), not the public, the safety trials were never demanded.

----

Dr. Wakefield mentions that dr. Byram Bridle only realized later that the COVID injections do not stay in the shoulder muscle as promised. It may be true that dr. Bridle realized this late, but it would not be difficult to find evidence to the contrary:

1. The lipid nanoparticles were specifically developed to go everywhere in the body so they could also pass the blood-brain barrier for use in cancer therapy. I remember dr. Robert Malone saying somewhere that he discussed this with Katalin Karikó (who currently works at BioNTech) in the 1990s.

2. Even Moderna's Wikipedia page (still) says for the year 2017: "[T]he mRNA spread beyond the injection site and was found in the liver, spleen, bone marrow and heart."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moderna

3. It has also been known for a very long time that when injecting into a muscle, it is possible to unknowingly inject into a small blood vessel in that muscle. The injected substance would then be transported all over the body with the blood. See for instance:

Prof. dr. Arne Burkhardt warns: Intravenous vaccine injections possible, dangerous
https://rumble.com/v1bbzjx-prof.-dr.-arne-burkhardt-warns-intravenous-vaccine-injections-possible-dang.html

According to Steve Kirsch, Janet Woodcock (who was director of the FDA at the time) says they knew that the injected fluid would not stay in the shoulder muscle, but they THOUGHT it was harmless. So the fact that they knew it wouldn't stay in the arm, was not considered to be important. 🤬

REFERENCES

https://www.csap.cam.ac.uk/network/david-salisbury/

SOURCE

Segment taken from (starts around 45 min):

Steve Kirsch interviews dr. Andrew Wakefield
https://rumble.com/v180lgr-steve-kirsch-interviews-dr.-andrew-wakefield.html