Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "All drug industry trials should be seen as marketing until proven otherwise"
Referenced article from the British Medical Journal here:
From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire?
https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538.full
The corruption of the medicines agencies can be seen in the emergency approvals they made of for example remdesivir and the COVID jabs, even though there has not been an emergency since the first half of 2020.
Perhaps even worse are the authorizations that they REFUSED to provide, such as for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), ivermectin or fluvoxamine.
NB: These authorizations were not strictly required, since (1) the medicines were already authorized, and (2) off-label use is very commonplace and has always been allowed, except for COVID. Still, recommendations in the official guidelines would absolutely have been warranted.
The agencies may say that they "continually monitor the scientific evidence", but they also say that they haven't looked at any scientific evidence for a specific medicine since February of 2021. Of course, both cannot be true at the same time.
The recommendation of off-patent (which means off-profit) medicines and treatments will always be delayed because of "insufficient evidence", regardless of the mountains of evidence of efficacy and the even bigger mountains of evidence of safety due to many decades and billions of doses of use.
Conversely, even the most fraudulent or irrelevant 'study' that does not show statistically significant proof of effectiveness of an off-profit medicine (perhaps because the protocol was wrong and the study was merely underpowered) is used as 'proof' that it doesn't work.
For on-patent (which means highly profitable) medicines, even a press release is regarded as sufficient evidence for a recommendation. See for instance:
Fauci: highly profitable remdesivir to be standard of care based on "proof of concept" 4/29/2020
https://rumble.com/vpqlyq-fauci-toxic-ineffective-remdesivir-to-be-standard-of-care-based-on-proof-of.html
No amount of proof of fraud or further evidence of toxicity or ineffectiveness seems to be sufficient to retract authorizations of highly profitable products. For instance, both remdesivir and the COVID jabs are used almost everywhere, even though there has been strong scientific evidence that they're unnecessary, highly toxic, and ineffective or countereffective respectively.
-
LIVE
Right Side Broadcasting Network
5 days agoLIVE REPLAY: President Trump Holds a Rally in Uniondale, New York - 9/18/24
7,618 watching -
2:12:03
Benny Johnson
8 hours ago🚨Trump Speaking LIVE Right NOW At FIRST RALLY Since Assassination Attempt | THOUSANDS in New York!
101K118 -
2:14:03
Fresh and Fit
7 hours agoThe Game Has Changed: How Modern Dating is Different & Why Men Struggle
82.8K40 -
1:19:00
Glenn Greenwald
11 hours agoIsrael's War on Terror; Fighting Campus and Government Censorship with FIRE's Nico Perrino | SYSTEM UPDATE #336
91.3K68 -
1:15:23
Dr. Drew
14 hours agoLara Trump LIVE: Election Integrity, Immigration & The Aftermath Of 2 Assassin Attempts Against Her Father-In-Law Donald Trump – Ask Dr. Drew
100K22 -
5:10:45
Drew Hernandez
17 hours agoTRUMP RALLY UNIONDALE NEW YORK
88.3K39 -
1:15:06
Michael Franzese
10 hours agoTrump assassination attempt & fact checking Harris | Michael Franzese LIVE! Ep. 18
90.1K42 -
1:55:58
Melonie Mac
9 hours agoGo Boom Live Ep 21!
75.6K18 -
1:40:08
Redacted News
11 hours agoSHOCK! Secret Service admits it CAN'T stop more Trump Assassination Attempts | Redacted Live
197K310 -
50:56
Candace Show Podcast
11 hours agoExploding Pagers In Lebanon! Is This Terrorism? | Candace Ep 67
232K969