Dr. Clare Craig: There Is No Science or Benign Explanation for Approving These Jabs for Babies
2 years ago
77
Dr. Clare Craig: There Is No Science or Benign Explanation for Approving These Jabs for Babies
"If a child under five catches COVID, then the chance of a death with COVID is 1 in 250,000 at its worst ... And because it's not a risk, when they were doing the trial, they couldn't measure it. You shouldn't be doing a trial where you can't measure the benefit."
"There is no interpretation of this evidence that is benign. It's just ridiculously clear that this has gone wrong. The system has gone wrong; the regulator is not working."
Loading 2 comments...
-
1:42
RaisingAwareness
1 year agoRand Paul on Required Jabs For Children: Not Only Against Scientific Evidence, ‘It Is Malpractice’
130 -
3:09
MLordandGod
1 year agoRand Paul: “Appalling” That CDC Has Approved Toxic COVID Jabs for Children
39 -
1:22:37
Dr. Drew
7 months agoDr. Clare Craig: The 12 Beliefs About Viral Covid That Are NOT Supported By Evidence – Ask Dr. Drew
46.4K91 -
2:19
Stingyboi2
1 year agoDr. Clare Craig
4 -
2:27
chinlee
1 year agoDr Mark Trozzi talks about the gene altering jab and its effects on children.
622 -
1:51
QTheCrowd
1 year agoDR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: THE CVD JABS ARE KILLING CHILDREN CHILDREN
201 -
18:21
Joe Pags
1 year agoDr. Peter McCullough on the Covid Jabs, "Not Safe For Human Use!"
3.31K11 -
0:55
Truthseekers17
1 year agoDr. McCullough Explains Why the Jab, Not the Virus
66 -
16:37
galacticstorm
1 year agoYou Want Facts on Covid and the Jabs? That's What Dr Peter McCullough Brings
84 -
16:37
Joe Pags
1 year agoYou Want Facts on Covid and the Jabs? That's What Dr Peter McCullough Brings
8.52K15