Minarchist Defending Anarcho Capitalism: Debunking Xexizy On Private Security

I am a Minarchist defending Anarcho Capitalism because I believe it deserves its chance. Debunking @Xexizy on private security among other things on Anarchism, although I believe there is a role for government, I would never say no if Anarchism was ever given the chance.

Anarcho Capitalism can be viewed as very idealistic and must be said that it is nothing at all like the irraitonal attempt you saw in Capitol Hill, Seattle (CHAZ/CHOP). Instead, there is private security, a court system and is most certainly not lawless. I cover a variety of these arguments in my video. Bearing in mind, my knowledge on Anarcho Capitalism will not be to the same extent as someone who has done a lot more research into it.

I am not someone who is purely ideological, I go by arguments that correlate to what history has proven, therefore, unlike other Libertarians, I support any position which defends the free and open market as that is what is most important for me and for what would benefit society as a whole in my eyes.

@Xexizy bases his assumption that under Anarcho Capitalism there is one corporation and it just rules all, almost as if to say that it acts as a central planner. His arguments are purely theoretical and doesn't live up to real world history that contradicts him.

You can read more on the private security by Murray N. Rothbard here which is a fantastic article: https://mises.org/wire/privatize-police

Another fantastic article by Tate Fegley on Private Policing Isn't a Fantasy:
https://mises.org/wire/private-policing-isnt-fantasy