Name: BOMBSHELL: Dr. Clare Craig exposes how Pfizer twisted their clinical trial data for young children
Uploaded: 2022-06-19T11:41:54+00:00
Duration: 4 min 39 s
Description: Only 4526 children between 6 months and 4 years of age participated in the trial. This is way too little to give any meaningful data on safety. A whopping 3000 participants (66%) did not finish the tr

2 years ago

617

COVID19 vaccine VaxInjury VaxSafety VaccineMandate

Only 4526 children between 6 months and 4 years of age participated in the trial. This is way too little to give any meaningful data on safety.

A whopping 3000 participants (66%) did not finish the trial! 😮 No reason was given for this. This is a huge red flag. It would be extremely informative which part of the 3000 was in the 'vaccine' group and which part was in the placebo group.

'Severe COVID' was (mis)defined as a slightly increased heart rate and a few more breaths per minute. This is more like a mild cold than severe COVID if you ask me. Talk about inflation of terms.

In the 'vaccine' group, 6 children had 'severe COVID', and only 1 in the placebo group. This fact alone is a strong signal that the jabbed are more vulnerable. Can you spell 'iatrogenic'?

Only one child was hospitalized in the trial with a fever and a seizure. This child had been vaxxed.

It is by now well known that the most vulnerable period is right after injection:

- During the first 3 weeks between the first and second injection, 34 children in 'vaccine' group got 'COVID', and only 13 in the placebo group. This data was ignored.
- In the 8 week gap between the second and third dose, a similar pattern was visible. This data was also ignored.
- In the few weeks after the third dose, the pattern was visible for the third time. This data was ignored for the third time.

In the end, 97% of the 'COVID' cases were ignored, which left only tiny numbers to analyze. Only 3 children in the 'vaccine' arm got COVID outside of the ignored window, and 7 children in the placebo arm. This was used as 'proof' that the 'vaccine' is effective.

The trial only had a 2 month follow-up period. During this time, 12 children got sick with COVID twice. 11 of these (92%) were vaxxed, mostly with 3 doses. The is a signal of VAIDS (Vaccine Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome): chronic susceptibility to disease due to an impaired immune system.

So now they want to mass inject children who have statistically 0 risk of severe disease and death from COVID. There is no safety data from this 'trial', but the real-world data on older children, young adults and older adults, all point to by far the most toxic 'vaccine' in the history of mankind.

Pfizer have applied for an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), which would allow them to deal this drug also to infants whilst being completely protected from liability claims. Minor detail: There is no emergency, because young healthy children are not at risk of serious injury or death from COVID.

Parents might want to consider the saying, "Just say no to drugs".

Originally these products were also sold as a means of protecting others: "Get vaxxed to protect grandma". First of all, it's completely unethical to use healthy people as a human shield for unhealthy people (a large majority of whom are unhealthy due to their own diet and lifestyle decisions) if this exposes them to health risks. This is even more true since there are cheap, safe, available, highly effective alternatives that the high risk group can use to protect themselves.

Now it also has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that these injections do not reduce infection or transmission the slightest. In fact, it's the complete opposite: the jabbed have an impaired immune system and don't seem to build naturally acquired immunity, so they're a HIGHER infection risk than the unjabbed.

All participants were unblinded after 6 weeks. This means they were informed whether they had received the 'vaccine' or the placebo. Then everyone who had received the placebo, was offered the 'vaccine'. (This is 'cross-over', where participants from the placebo group cross over to the treatment group.) This destroys the control group for longer term safety and efficacy data collection.

The vaxx fanatics and drug dealers surely are happy with this, because it erects another barrier to proving that the jabs are unsafe and ineffective. For any other 'imperfect' study, they will just point to its imperfections and dismiss everything, regardless of how large the signal and regardless of how impotent their own 'proof'.