Re: PVK Q/A: Christianity, Alzheimer’s and Our True Identity Hidden in Christ, (Paul VanderKlay)

Raw file label: Voice 049 paul van der klay

this recording is in response to this video:
https://youtu.be/DAINjcEDhEE

this content also some some parallels to these videos on Paul's channel:
https://youtu.be/DvSJT80LcNU

and in addendum to my comment found under that video, reading as such:

There is a bit too much doctrinal plasticity in this for my liking, doctrine cannot make room for its anti-thesis, tolerance of doctrinal disparity, is a recipe for no doctrine and no room for understanding of real doctrine. It does not begin with the atoms in material terms, it begins with Adam. You might further query, what is the material effigy of "Adam", and that is perhaps mystery and woo to the 'materialist', but then materialism is a bankrupt philosophical conjecture, and so, it matters very little, whether or not the stacking of turtles works out for them or not. I would draw your attention to this video, and my analysis to these kinds of issues raised by Evan: https://youtu.be/ss2_PIzl9ik
& my riff on the similar subject matter: https://youtu.be/wyYZnNxtlOg

Furthermore: a place for ambiguity is called for, when there is no apparent synthesis that can be forged, or managed, but that is the concession of "I don't know", not the false-peace, of avoiding conflict, merely to preserve a wild and unwieldy circus tent of broad acclaim, that will enculturate itself to not even hear the need for sound doctrine, so enamored it is in its own sophistications. Integration is more an art than science, and so, it behooves one to search far afield, to piece back together the secret mysteries of God: but doctrine has a core place, and you might have told me that the discord server was not a church, but yet you talk of hidden in Christ... But this is a then, a doctrinal contention I have, that the lines are blurred, being friend to the flesh or friend of the spirit; when we lose sight of Christ, in the identity of some collective unconscious Christ... this is an article of faith, and it is real, but without sound doctrine, or the hope of sound doctrine being forged, it is merely diversionary and folly. Much of the "Christian sects" (so-called, in the 'west') are not yet accustomed to the gift of the Apostle.

I would like to know about how you perceive the different strains of theological divides... you called the Dutch Reform, the frozen Chosen, my only basis in Christian doctrinal religion, is planted in the Old Apostolic Church of Africa: I do not know how that is connected in history to other organizations, but the new teaching of the that church, which began in 1994, was designed by an evangelist and myself, and later confirmed by a council of elders for the Church to be adopted: Are you familiar with its doctrine? How would you characterize it? Their teachings certainly don't anyone to sleep, in my belief and experiences, although I might be wrong (as it goes without saying).