MAP/Pedophile Conversion Therapy vs LGBT Conversion Therapy (Or, My Hangups, My Choice To Change?)

Is there a one way valve when it comes to sexually progressive ideas of change? Are people who want to go back up the progressive stack in the spirit of infinite sexual/gender malleability a threat to the #bornthisway community? it's not like there's one answer, because everyone is different. I tried using a MAP who wants conversions therapy as a hyperbolic example of my point.
This is a potentially a very hot shit take, but I'll ask it anyway

The whole shtick on the left is that truth and wrongness is relative and subjective. We understand detransitioning, or girls or boys being abused as kids fucking with their sexual prefences later (even twin studies debunk a lot of the old gay gene myths), but people who detransition or who realised they weren't lesbians don't get a flag or a letter in the acronym, because they undermine the supposedly rock solid validity of their identities, which can also be so fluid and malleable that it's irreconcilable with the first assertion of auto assumed rock solidness

To be crude, if you can cut a girls tits off, a boys dick off, sterilise them and end a billion year long line of death and rebirth, all with the "consent" of the child, often with parents not being able to stop them, how is touching a child out of bounds? Why is detransitioning therapy something that gets you're medical licence revoked, but trans affirmation therapy is fine? if someone wants either and that's "what they want for themselves, no matter the reason", why the "one way valve" as I characterised it?

379712955