Allan Parker: The SCOTUS Leak was a Shocking and Unprecedented Intimidation Tactic

Allan Parker Esq. of the Justice Foundation sat down with Bill McIntosh to talk the Scotus leak that was published in Politico that concerned a draft opinion written by Samuel Alito to the effect that Roe vs Wade and the infamous Planned Parenthood vs. Casey decision that upheld Roe vs Wade should be over turned. That revelation hit the news in the pages of Politico on May 3rd with the force of an earthquake. Allan Parker’s Justice Foundation submitted an amicus brief for the current landmark case of Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health. Parker was also Norma McCorvey’s attorney after her Christian conversion and in a previous interview discussed the supposed recanting of that conversion to the pro life position and is very well versed in pro life jurisprudence.
When the SCOTUS draft was leaked in which Associate Justice Samuel Alito had written:“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” there then resulted numerous outrageous protests and disruptions at Christian churches and protests outside the homes of Chief Justice John Roberts and of Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh. It energized the pro abortion Democrats just when their fortunes are falling fast. The Dems are floundering thanks to the inept leadership of Joe Biden as the nation faces sky high gasoline process, an invasion at our Southern border and the federal government’s dispatching of baby formula by the truckload for illegal immigrants while American babies are facing dire circumstances as their anxious parents must travel many miles in frantic, hour long searches for infant formula. Parker deemed the leak not only unprecedented but geared towards intimidating the members of the US Supreme Court to change their votes to keep Roe v Wade in place. He cited an earlier instance of this in 1992 when Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy reportedly caved from the pro life position after he saw the Million Woman’s March in Washington, DC and then helped form a majority to protect Roe vs Wade in the Casey vs Planned Parenthood case.
One extremely important development in the years since the Roe vs. Wade decision was the safe harbor legislation or “Baby Moses” law that creates a mechanism for any woman to turn over custody of her baby at a designated site such as a hospital or fire station and at no cost to her. This is extremely important due to the fact that a legal concept, termed the reliance factor must be adequately addressed in case a Supreme Court decision is to be over turned. This is besides the fact that a SCOTUS decision to be over turned must also be deemed grievously wrong. The reliance factor means that since women have come to rely upon abortion in order to participate fully in economic and social life of the nation then there must be some mechanism that stands as a remedy in this sense in the absence of legal abortion. That remedy is the Baby Moses law pioneered in Texas in 1999 and that by 2008 has been enacted in all 50 states. Allan Parker explained the importance of this safe harbor remedy:
But I also believe that one of the arguments that's made in our briefs, and that was mentioned by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in the oral argument, will eventually help end the abortion wars. And that's the safe haven law. And this is not a matter of public policy, under constitutional law, and the law of judicial precedent, when you follow a Supreme Court decision, and when you reverse it, one of the factors is the Reliance interest. The first thing you ask is, was the decision wrong? And or was it not just a little bit wrong, but was it grievously wrong? And of course, killing a human being and injuring women is great, terribly wrong. But then you also as well, have people come to rely upon the decision again, in 1992. The I just read it again today and Planned Parenthood V. Casey, the three judge plurality, that became the law said, Well, women have come to rely upon abortion in order to participate fully in the economic and social life of the nation. So even if Roe was wrong, we're going to keep it because of the Reliance factor. That was 1992. Well, in 1999, the states began passing baby Moses laws, also called Safe Haven laws. And today, in every state, if abortion is reversed, even if you live in a state that bans abortion, you will not have to parent the baby, if you're a woman that can't take care of the baby, or doesn't want to every state has a safe haven law, where the woman could simply safely surrender her baby at a designated place, usually a hospital or fire station within a designated time, usually 330 6090 days. And she's free, free the freedom of Roe v. Wade, without killing the child and injuring the mother. And so I think we can have the freedom of row without the negative consequences. And what will happen to the children instead of being killed. That will be given to the one to 2 billion women every year in America on a rolling basis. They want to adopt a newborn baby. So it's a win win win. Why would we keep fighting about the issue? We can help the baby and the mother and the homes waiting to adopt children? I think it's a great solution.
Allan encourages all to sign the Moral Outcry Petition which is available at https://themoraloutcry.com/. He also urges you to get on a small monthly donation plan at the Justice Foundation which has been active at both the state of Texas level and the US Supreme Court. https://txjf.networkforgood.com/projects/122527-the-justice-foundation-2022-general-givingShow more

Many are deeply concerned about the reckless leadership in our nation not only concerning issues like the sanctity of life and traditional marriage and sexuality but also the appalling lack of stewardship of the economy. We urge you to help protect your assets by buying precious metals at https://ourgoldguy.com/ Please tell them that Bill McIntosh sent you!