Premium Only Content
This video is only available to Rumble Premium subscribers. Subscribe to
enjoy exclusive content and ad-free viewing.
Roe v. Wade Reversal: What Would It Mean For The Future Of Privacy Rights?
3 years ago
1.53K
Deana Sacks hosts Counterspeech with guest Emily Anderson to discuss the leaked draft opinion by Justice Alito in the pending case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which threatens to reverse Roe v. Wade (1973) such that there is no federal constitutional right of abortion. The right of abortion was found to be implicit in the privacy aspect of the Liberty Clause in Roe v. Wade. Other rights such as the right of gay sexual autonomy have also been found to be implicit in the privacy aspect of the Liberty Clause (Lawrence v. Texas, 2003). If Roe v. Wade is reversed, are other rights implicit in the Liberty Clause also at risk for being dismantled? Could the constitutional right of privacy be at risk altogether?
Loading comments...
-
55:19
COUNTERSPEECH
2 years agoSex Trafficking & Government Collusion
66 -
LIVE
LFA TV
12 hours agoLIVE & BREAKING NEWS! | WEDNESDAY 12/03/25
3,148 watching -
LIVE
Nikko Ortiz
39 minutes agoDo Not Laugh... | Rumble LIVE
195 watching -
LIVE
Benny Johnson
1 hour ago🚨DEMS PANIC: Republicans SWEEP Elections as Trump Announces MASSIVE Travel Ban | PIERS MORGAN LIVE
4,467 watching -
LIVE
Badlands Media
10 hours agoBadlands Daily – December 3, 2025
3,346 watching -
27:03
The Kevin Trudeau Show Limitless
58 minutes agoThey're Not Hiding Aliens. They're Hiding This.
23 -
UPCOMING
Caleb Hammer
18 hours agoPathetic Simp Drowning In Debt For Busty Latinas | Financial Audit
1.86K -
1:39:27
Graham Allen
2 hours agoTrump NUKES Biden’s Entire “Legacy” + Did Candace Implicate TPUSA In Charlie’s Death?!??
109K513 -
LIVE
Matt Kohrs
13 hours agoLive Day Trading, Breaking Market News & Options Analysis || Stock Market Open
581 watching -
LIVE
Wendy Bell Radio
6 hours agoTime To Take Out The Trash
7,486 watching