Leicester On The #Crypto That RUGGED @Bleeves Crypto - Strange Inu

2 years ago
17

We did a similar look at the BabyApeNodes which rugged @Crypto Realist - and turns out CR is also on this one as an Influencer.

We'd skipped it because as we said, we don't cover tokens that are getting a lot of social media chatter until and unless they deliver something and the dust settles.

Also it's Binance Smart Chain. We have significant amounts of exposure to and awareness of BSC - it's why we flag every BSC-only token as high risky, because BSC has way more scams than not.

On the surface, a LOT of work was put on this. A detailed whitepaper, a clear plan to hook into whatever "Doctor Strange" upcoming film, significant social media activity, regular communication with Influencers, etc.

But it didn't really "do" anything. That was Flag #1. It went after Influencers without anything to show for it (which was a concern raised recently by @Ryan Patrick ).

But the biggest flag is in their OWN "Audit".

Thus, we're going to make the statement: the following other people COULD NOT HAVE read that document - or if they did, they ignored or didn't understand what they were reading. It can only be one of those conclusions.

@Crypto Queen
@My Crypto Journey
@Adam Shelton
@Jazz Royce

The image of this video called out the specific segments in their "audit", written April 8th, around when this first launched.

These segments openly admit that they were going to rip people off.

Worse, the audit appears to be them self-auditing - which means it has no value. No Dessert Finance audit (which would have highlighted many of these issues).

Also, the contract code is nearly identical to another token that was confirmed a scam from last year, and shared wallet transactions with another token, SIONX, confirmed to be a honeypot.

There's all kinds of smoke on this one. These had to be some crazy charming people to be able to convince all of these Influencers to cover this.

Loading comments...