Name: "Heart issues and Bell's Palsy have gone through the roof since the boosters" | Channel 9 Australia
Uploaded: 2022-04-12T12:23:25+00:00
Duration: 2 min 16 s
Description: "There's a ward filled with people with similar issues [to professional Australian rules footballer player Ollie Wines] in Adelaide. So nausea, heart issues. There has to be something more to it." One

2 years ago

597

COVID19 vaccine VaxInjury VaxSafety VaccineMandate australia

"There's a ward filled with people with similar issues [to professional Australian rules footballer player Ollie Wines] in Adelaide. So nausea, heart issues. There has to be something more to it."

One of the commentators says, "We've all done our due diligence with the boosters shots and all that sort of stuff". 'Due diligence' in this case almost certainly means no more than listening to the government and main stream media proclaim the injections are necessary, safe and effective.

The other commentator said, "We don't want to get into the space where we're not experts in at all", i.e. the medical space. However, the media not being medical experts at all, didn't withhold them from calling out and shaming all the stupid anti-vaxxers and promoting the 'vaccines'.

The following article claims there's no relationship between Ollie Wines' sudden heart issues and the COVID jab:

"It’s more a heart rhythm issue that is pretty common in elderly people and elite athletes."

“His cardiologist, according to Port [Adelaide Football Club], says there’s no link to the vaccine or any COVID issues that have caused or triggered that heart problem.”

https://7news.com.au/sport/afl/port-adelaide-star-ollie-wines-responds-to-vaccine-links-after-heart-problem-during-loss-to-melbourne-c-6409591

If the heart rhythm issue is associated with elite athletes, why has the incidence in elite athletes suddenly shot up since 2021? Have elite athletes suddenly become significantly more elite?

I wonder on exactly which facts Wines' cardiologist based the conclusion that "there’s no link to the vaccine". Could it be that the conclusion was exclusively made on the 'fact' that vaccines are safe and therefore cannot cause heart issues? Could it be that the cardiologist would get mercilessly canceled for causing vaccine hesitancy and loss of public trust if (s)he acknowledged that the 'vaccine' might have caused the issues?

REFERENCES

https://www.nine.com.au/