My Body and My Choice: Swimming with the Fishes

A DEFENSE OF NECESSITY AND/OR OPPORTUNITY FOR BRADY RULE EVIDENCE DISCOVERY?

Some anonymous trolls were convinced one fringe independent, not an option, candidate for Congress was an artificial intelligence bot, while others were convinced that he was Rudy Giulani operating under a pseudonym, and he obviously was not the Liberty University Champion for Christ removed from the Black History Timeline of a formerly elite, private college in the Shenandoah, where the most laudable accomplishments of alumni is being a former army captain who spent his time whittling USA flag creations from wood. Go, Generals!

However, in Gagelonia v. Commonwealth, 52 Va.App. 99 (2008), one Red Rose Rescue participant, and former childhood protege, had come upon, in a case in which not even the NAACP Legal Defense Fund was interested, that eventually nullified the provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that had been recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in Georgia v. Rachel in 1966, in a case involving persons accused of trespassing, while integrating lunch counters in Atlanta, a unique creature of Brady Rule evidence, from the Supreme Court decision in Brady v. Maryland, regarding discovery of potentially exculpatory evidence that is mandated to be available to those accused of crimes by police that would impeach the prosecution and/or defense in an attempt to obtain a conviction, and increasingly appearing to be available to those nine persons recently indicted in a grand jury, under what appears to be a politically motivated decision, even transforming what had traditionally been a prosecution tool to defend voting rights into a method to punish those against abortion, and providing an extra layer of protection to "precious cargo" in human lives, even greater than deposits in banks, insured by the FDIC, and greater even than afforded to owners in a peculiar institution of American chattel slavery. And, he really ain't black, as a person who voted for Donald Trump, supported Ronald Reagan, and organized Kids to Re-Elect the President--a Nixon KREEP.

This tends to bolster a defense of necessity, as articulated in the 1980 case of U.S. v. Bailey, an opinion drafted by the conservative Justice Rehnquist, and a matter in which the historical appointee Thurgood Marshal had abstained. And he is just a person trained in investigations since college, a former tracker of terrorists, spies, drug dealers and other ne'erdowells, with three unreported cases at the Suprem Court, and not a "brave" investigative reporter for Live Action.

But a note for all of the Sopranos: despite what you see in the movies, while it may raise suspicions to have a dead Negro in your trunk, unless, like one New Jersey police officer, you happened to have also killed the decedent, it's like perfectly legal. Ask the officer to prove you killed the Negro, and practice the line, "Honest, Officers, I was just being a Good Samaritan." And, if anybody asks, tell them Consigliere Junior sent ya.